HUDSON REPORTER – We get letters. Lots of letters. But due to our experiences over the years, we instituted a policy more than 10 years ago of not accepting critical letters about local elections the very weekend before the election, since we are a weekly newspaper and candidates don’t have the time to respond or correct accusations. This applies to all attacks, new or old, about local candidates.
If you want to submit a critical letter about local candidates, politicians or slates, please do so this weekend.
NOTE: Letters about “yes” or “no” regarding school budgets and public questions will still be okay the last weekend, but keep in mind that if it takes us too long to fact-check your claims, or if there is any question about the wording or veracity, your letter may be held up.
Thus, if you want to submit a critical letter for the election, the sooner the better.
Please refer to our letters policy, frequently published on the letters page of your local newspaper.
Guidelines
Letters may be submitted to editorial@hudsonreporter.com, must be under 500 words, and must include your name, phone number, and address for verification purposes. Please include those on the actual letter. If sending by email, please attach it in word AND paste it in the body of the email.
Following these rules will help your letter slide faster through formatting, fact checking, and verification.
NOTE: We always call ALL letter writers within 1-4 days of receiving your letter, depending on which day of the week we receive it (a letter sent on a Friday will likely not get a call until the following week). If you do not receive a call, that means we didn’t see or receive the letter; please email it again or call the editor at (201) 798-7800. We have printed thousands of letters over the years, many critical, many controversial, but we must have your contact information and receive the letter in order to publish it.
Move Forward's has lots of money, so don't worry about a thing.
As we know much of the $7000.00 plus excess ended up paying for ads in the Hoboken Reporter.
Those dollar totals don't include this weeks ads ......
Do Move Forward operatives get to post more of their loathing for GA *after* your deadline?
After all they only reason the "issue" exists is they thought she was the graphic artist for the campaign. Now they're stuck with their strategic disaster. Knowing the leaders of that group, their instinct will be to double-down rather than let it go and stop making fools of themselves.
What-say, editors?
While both sides of the coin are embarrassing Kids First is extremely tainted and quite embarrassing. Kids First previous graphic designer and supped no longer GD is a hate filled resident who depicts people as turds in punch bowls and creates Nati imagery. She also has to comment about every damn thing on the internet, making it frustrating for others to follow and read. On the current BoE you have a member that married a man that she once baby sat for. Jean Marie votes on things with her son in mind first, like computers, she doesn't put anyone else first but her own kids. Ruthie, well I will run out of writing space on her. WSJ puts Hoboken last under the current BoE members. Numbers don't lie and the theatrics with the current BoE is laughable at best. Kudos to HR for ignoring GA's prepared statement.
But there's nothing in GA's statement that isn't consistent with the tone of her site. I don't know what happiness claiming she didn't write it brings you, but whatever.
This on the other hand CAN'T be denied. We know who paid for the truck and who paid for the video.
Deny it if you must, but that this point, no adult believes you. If that matters.
Video: http://grafixavenger.blogspot.com/2012/10/nazi-truck-video-source-beth-masons.html
Buyer: http://grafixavenger.blogspot.com/2012/10/who-hired-move-forwards-swastikas-on.html
GA wrote her statement to the Hoboken Reporter.
The Nazi truck incident was just the latest in a long line of political smears from same Old Guard politicos. It backfired on them like most of their political mud chucking have in the past and now they are desperately trying to do damage control.
Unlike the Old Guard politiocs who hide behind front people on their BOE ticket or have their paid political consultants who have already written their letters for HR and are now shopping around for a non-toxi name to sign and submit them, Grafix Avenger has always stood openly behind her opinions.
But I wonder if Fulop knows he will never be taken seriously as any kind of reformer so long has he has people like you on speed dial
Video: http://grafixavenger.blogspot.com/2012/10/nazi-truck-video-source-beth-masons.html
Buyer: http://grafixavenger.blogspot.com/2012/10/who-hired-move-forwards-swastikas-on.html
That's why you hate GA: she exposes the filth that rides in with Move Forward.
His ringing endorsement of Move Forward is hilarious.
New faces? Liz Markevitch's face is about as "new" as Inez Keim's.
His other "big issue" is non-candidate, non-campaign worker Pincus.
What a joke. So much for "the reasons you should vote for Move Forward". Their own paid stooges weren't even told any reasons to give.
Meanwhile he is also admitting that 1200 Washington which is an untaxed 5013C is being used for political purposes.
This dope might as well be a mole for Kids First. Let him talk all he wants.