search
Home Blog

Knicks Beat Spurs to Win NBA Cup, Brunson Named MVP

By
Paulius Kundzelevicius
-
Jalen Brunson Claims NBA Cup MVP as Knicks Win

New York Knicks guard Jalen Brunson was named the Most Valuable Player of the 2025 Emirates NBA Cup. He became the third player to win the award, joining LeBron James and Giannis Antetokounmpo.

Brunson received 19 of 20 votes from a panel of media members, with teammate OG Anunoby earning the remaining vote. Fan voting counted for five total votes, and Brunson received two of those tallies.

Key Takeaways
  • Jalen Brunson was named the 2025 Emirates NBA Cup MVP after receiving 19 of 20 media votes and averaging 33.3 points, 6.7 assists, and 3.7 rebounds during the tournament.
  • The New York Knicks defeated the San Antonio Spurs in the NBA Cup championship after erasing a double-digit deficit, with final scores reported as 124-113.
  • Bench contributions, strategic coaching decisions, and repeated success in pressure situations defined the Knicks’ Cup run.

Knicks Defeat Spurs To Capture NBA Cup Championship

The Knicks won the 2025 NBA Cup on Tuesday night by rallying past the San Antonio Spurs in the championship game. The final score of the game was 124-113, and the victory completed an 11-point comeback after New York trailed late in the third quarter.

Brunson finished the championship game with 25 points, eight assists, and four rebounds. He scored six points in the fourth quarter and played 41 minutes while being defended by Spurs guards Stephon Castle, De’Aaron Fox, and Dylan Harper. When Brunson was on the floor, the Knicks were 18 points better than the Spurs.

San Antonio entered the final after defeating the 24-2 Oklahoma City Thunder in the semifinals. Victor Wembanyama, who had returned in that game, increased his playing time from 21 minutes in the semifinal to 25 minutes in the championship. The Spurs built an 11-point lead late in the third quarter and had seven players score in double figures.

OG Anunoby led all scorers in the championship game with 28 points on 10-of-17 shooting. He also recorded nine rebounds and three assists. Karl-Anthony Towns was temporarily sidelined by an apparent first-half injury and was shown grimacing earlier in the game.

Jordan Clarkson scored 15 points off the bench and hit two consecutive three-pointers after entering the game shooting 28% from three-point range. Mitchell Robinson played 18 minutes and collected 15 rebounds, including 10 offensive rebounds, while occupying Wembanyama in the paint. Those rebounds frequently led to possessions that resulted in the Knicks’ 15 made three-pointers. Tyler Kolek ran the offense late and dished out critical assists over the final three minutes.

Every Knicks player earned $530,933 in prize money for the win, while Spurs players received $212,373 each as runners-up.

Betting Markets Reflect Knicks’ Rising Profile

As the Knicks advanced through the tournament and completed their comeback in the championship game, betting markets adjusted accordingly. Before the title game in Las Vegas, New York was listed as a slight favorite, with multiple betting previews showing the Knicks favored by 2.5 points, a total of 227.5, and a moneyline of -135, while the Spurs were listed at +115.

After the championship win, futures markets continued to move in response to New York’s performance. Sportsbook listings showed the Knicks with NBA title odds ranging from +1000 at Caesars to +1300 at both BetMGM and DraftKings, while FanDuel listed New York at +1100. An opening price of +750 was also cited for comparison. FanDuel’s separate NBA Finals futures page listed the Knicks at +1500.

Eastern Conference odds also tightened, with one listing placing New York at +300 to win the East. At the individual level, Brunson’s performances carried betting relevance as well. He was listed at +1700 in Finals MVP markets at FanDuel, +8000 in NBA MVP opening odds at Covers, and +25000 in NBA MVP odds at BetMGM. Brunson also appeared at +4000 in BetMGM’s Clutch Player of the Year market.

Brunson’s Production Defined The Tournament

Across NBA Cup play, Brunson averaged 33.3 points, 6.7 assists, and 3.7 rebounds. His scoring totals during the tournament were 29, 33, 37, 35, 40, and 25 points. He also shot 46% from three-point range.

In the quarterfinals, Brunson scored 35 points against the Toronto Raptors, shooting 13-for-19 from the field and 6-for-9 from beyond the arc. In the semifinals, he scored 40 points against the Orlando Magic, helping the Knicks reach their first title game of any kind since 1999, when they lost to the Spurs.

After the championship game, Brunson credited his teammates. “Without Tyler Kolek, OG Anunoby, Mitchell Robinson, and Jordan Clarkson, we don’t win this game,” he said while accepting the MVP award. At the final buzzer, Brunson embraced Kolek, Clarkson, and Robinson.

“This is a goal of ours that we get to check off,” Brunson said. “It’s an important stepping stone for us. We can still learn from this game and get better, as well. I’m very thankful for the opportunity presented to ourselves.”

Pressure Situations Highlight Growth Under Mike Brown

The Knicks were coached by first-year head coach Mike Brown, who valued the NBA Cup’s single-elimination format. “During the course of the year, you try to find situations to put pressure on your group,” Brown said. “This is a single-elimination tournament when you get to a certain point. Every game counts.”

Brown used Kolek alongside Brunson to counter San Antonio’s guards and leaned heavily on the bench. Brown said the pressure created by the tournament “is manufactured without you as a coach having to try to do it all the time,” adding that success in those moments can build confidence throughout the organization.

Brunson described the start of his relationship with Brown, saying the coach called him and met him for dinner, where they talked for two to three hours without discussing basketball. “I really appreciated the time he spent coming down to see me,” Brunson said. “It was a great first impression.”

Knicks’ Standing And Historical Context

The Knicks are 18-7 and sit second in the Eastern Conference, 2.5 games behind the Detroit Pistons. Their NBA Cup run included wins over the Charlotte Hornets and Milwaukee Bucks in group play, followed by victories against the Toronto Raptors, Orlando Magic, and Spurs.

New York has not reached the NBA Finals since 1999, and they have not won a championship since 1973, a span of 52 years. That championship came a year after the birth of Rick Brunson, Jalen Brunson’s father, a former Knicks player and current assistant coach.

While the NBA Cup championship game does not count toward regular-season statistics, the Knicks viewed the experience as meaningful. “A game like this, an environment like this, you don’t really see around the NBA too often,” Brunson said.

“I always focus on staying levelheaded through the positives, through the negatives,” he added. “You can’t get too high, can’t get too low. This is great. We’re going to enjoy this. But once we leave tomorrow, we’re moving on.”

The Last Shot: The Complete Story Behind Michael Jordan’s Iconic Game 6 Photograph

By
Paulius Kundzelevicius
-
The Last Shot: Complete Story

No sports documentary during the pandemic commanded attention the way The Last Dance did, drawing viewers back into the final chapter of Michael Jordan’s career with the Chicago Bulls. As the series approached its conclusion, the focus narrowed to Jordan’s final possession in Game 6 of the 1998 NBA Finals, the last shot he would take in a Bulls uniform and the play that secured the championship.

The jumper secured a title, became one of the most documented plays in basketball history, and produced an image later ranked number one on Sports Illustrated’s “100 Greatest Sports Photos of All Time.” The photograph was captured by Fernando Medina, positioned on the baseline while working for the NBA, at the instant Jordan released the shot that ended the Bulls’ dynasty.

Key Takeaways
  • Michael Jordan scored 45 points and hit the game-winning 20-footer with 5.2 seconds left to secure an 87–86 Game 6 victory and the Bulls’ sixth NBA title in eight years.
  • Fernando Medina captured the iconic photograph of the final shot, which was later ranked No. 1 on Sports Illustrated’s 100 Greatest Sports Photos of All Time.
  • The photograph was created using the Flash Wizard system, linking multiple film cameras operated by NBA Photos during the 1998 NBA Finals.

Fernando Medina’s Early Life and Entry Into NBA Photography

Fernando Medina’s journey into professional sports photography began well before his presence on NBA baselines. At the age of 3, Medina and members of his family fled Cuba for the United States following Fidel Castro’s rise to power. His parents concluded that communist Cuba was “no place to raise a family or run a business.” Prior to leaving the country, the family had established itself as successful entrepreneurs. Medina’s father, Rosendo, operated a cardboard business, while his mother, Diolanda, worked with photographers producing wedding photo albums that included embedded music boxes.

After high school, Medina continued the family’s entrepreneurial tradition by starting an audio-visual company with friends. Connections formed through that business eventually led to an opportunity with the Orlando Magic. In 1989, he became part of the franchise’s inaugural photography team, working under Tony Smith. His initial responsibilities did not involve shooting games; instead, he was tasked with delivering slide photographs.

Medina developed his photographic skills through hands-on experience, learning alongside respected figures in the industry such as Barry Gossage, Andrew D. Bernstein, Nathaniel Butler, and Walter Iooss. His role expanded over time, and in 1996, he was appointed official team photographer for the Magic. The position allowed him to cover NBA games on a full-time basis and travel to document NBA Finals, All-Star Games, and additional league events for both the NBA and Getty Images.

Throughout his career, Medina’s photographs were distributed globally and appeared in publications including Sports Illustrated, ESPN, SLAM, Hoops, Beckett, Bravo Sport, Dunkshoot, and Forbes, in addition to various websites and hardcover books. His work was also featured by The New York Times, The Los Angeles Times, USA Today, The Sporting News, and NBA.com. While Medina never submitted his images to photography competitions, two of his photographs were selected as NBA Photo of the Year by Getty Images, and his work also received recognition from Sports Illustrated.

Game 6 of the 1998 NBA Finals

Game 6 of the 1998 NBA Finals was played on June 14, 1998, at the Delta Center in Salt Lake City, Utah, between the visiting Chicago Bulls and the Utah Jazz — the championship series for the 1997–98 NBA season and a rematch of the previous year’s Finals.

Both teams finished the regular season with identical 62–20 records. Utah defeated the Los Angeles Lakers in the Western Conference Finals, while Chicago beat the Indiana Pacers in the Eastern Conference Finals. The Jazz swept the Bulls 2–0 during the regular season, giving Utah home-court advantage.

The Jazz won Game 1, the Bulls won Games 2 through 4, and Utah extended the series by winning Game 5 at the United Center 83–81 after Michael Jordan missed a potential game-winning three-pointer at the buzzer. None of the Bulls’ previous five Finals appearances had gone to a Game 7.

In Game 6, the Jazz led 49–45 at halftime and 66–61 after the third quarter. Scottie Pippen aggravated a back injury on the opening basket and was limited to 8 points on 4–7 shooting in 26 minutes. Michael Jordan attempted 35 of the Bulls’ 67 shots, scoring 45 points in 44 minutes. Karl Malone led Utah with 31 points, 11 rebounds, and 7 assists.

With 41.9 seconds left, John Stockton hit a three-pointer to give Utah an 86–83 lead. Jordan responded with a layup, cutting the deficit to one. With 18.9 seconds remaining and Utah in possession, Jordan stole the ball from Karl Malone in the low post and dribbled down the court. Guarded by Bryon Russell, Jordan drove inside the three-point line, executed a quick crossover, and hit a 20-footer with 5.2 seconds left to give Chicago an 87–86 lead.

Stockton missed a final three-point attempt, and the Bulls won their sixth championship in eight years. It was the final shot Jordan would take as a member of the Chicago Bulls, his 25th game-winning shot for the team.

The Technology and Teamwork Behind “The Last Shot” Photograph

The photograph that captured Jordan’s jumper was not the result of chance alone. It was the culmination of more than five years of research and development by NBA Photos, which had been testing a system originally used by Sports Illustrated photographers known as the Black Box, later referred to as the Flash Wizard system.

At the time, photographers had to bring and install their own strobe lights in arenas. The Flash Wizard system allowed multiple cameras to fire simultaneously using a single burst of strobe lighting, accounting for lag times across different 35mm and 120mm film cameras. Development included hiring an engineer from MIT and testing shutter lag down to milliseconds, while working within the limits of 36 frames per roll, or 24 frames for Hasselblad cameras.

During Game 6, photographers Andrew D. Bernstein, Scott Cunningham, and Fernando Medina worked together. Bernstein was positioned in the lower corner, Cunningham in an elevated position near center-court TV cameras, and Medina on the opposite baseline. Bernstein controlled the remote trigger, while Medina and Cunningham acted as “human drones,” continuously composing and maintaining focus without pressing the shutter themselves.

NBA Photos credited images to the photographer who was holding and composing the camera, while stationary cameras were credited to the photographer who installed them. When Jordan rose for the shot, Bernstein’s view became obstructed, resulting in a blurred image, but Medina and Cunningham captured the moment cleanly.

The final image stood out because it included sideline-to-sideline framing, the shot clock, the scoreboard, and the fans. Among them was a young boy in a Bulls jersey surrounded by Jazz fans, holding up six fingers in anticipation of Chicago’s sixth championship.

Broadcast Records, Legacy, and Continued Discussion

NBC broadcast Game 6 live as part of NBA on NBC. The game earned a 22.3 Nielsen rating and a 38 share, averaging 35.9 million viewers. At least 72 million people in the United States watched some portion of the game, making it the most-watched NBA game in history.

The shot remains one of the most discussed plays in league history. In 2010, John Hollinger of ESPN ranked it fourth among the 50 best single-game performances. Officiating decisions involving Howard Eisley and Ron Harper continue to be debated decades later. Bryon Russell later stated, “Whether he pushed off or not, he was making that shot.”

Hoboken Breaks Ground on 8.7-Acre Maritime Park Waterfront Project

By
Moses Lookman
-
Maritime Park

On December 10, the City of Hoboken began construction on Maritime Park, an 8.7-acre waterfront park located at the former Union Dry Dock site at 901 Sinatra Drive. The groundbreaking ceremony brought together city, county, and state officials to formally start the transformation of Hoboken’s final industrial waterfront parcel into a public park along the Hudson River.

Officials in attendance included Mayor Ravi S. Bhalla, Assemblyman John Allen, Hudson County Executive Craig Guy, Chairman of the Hudson County Board of Commissioners Anthony Romano, and Mayor-elect Emily Jabbour. The event followed decades of community organizing, negotiations, and planning aimed at completing a continuous public waterfront in Hoboken.

Key Takeaways
  • Hoboken broke ground on Maritime Park on December 10 at the former Union Dry Dock site at 901 Sinatra Drive.
  • The 8.7-acre project converts Hoboken’s last industrial waterfront parcel into fully public open space shaped through extensive community input.
  • Phase One construction is scheduled to start this winter and continue into spring 2026, with major work beginning in the first quarter of 2026.

Union Dry Dock and the Effort to Secure Public Waterfront Space

For more than a century, Union Dry Dock operated as a ship repair facility along the Hudson River and remained one of the last active pieces of Hoboken’s industrial maritime infrastructure. When industrial operations declined, the future use of the site became the subject of long-running debate and public concern.

At multiple points, the property faced potential conversion into a permanent ferry refueling and maintenance facility. Nearly eight years ago, a NJ Transit meeting, held on Martin Luther King Jr. Day during the administration of then-Governor Chris Christie, included an agenda item related to a takeover of the site. The agenda item was later pulled.

In response to these proposals, residents organized marches, rallies, and waterfront demonstrations. Local advocacy groups worked alongside the City of Hoboken to oppose attempts by NJ Transit to acquire the property. The site also faced the possibility of becoming a ferry fueling station for New York Waterway.

Litigation and negotiations continued for several years. The City of Hoboken ultimately reached an amicable agreement with NY Waterway to acquire the property for public open space. State involvement later supported the project through funding secured during that process.

Planning and Design Based on Public Input

City officials say Maritime Park is intended to serve as a space for recreation, environmental restoration, and hands-on learning. The final layout reflects months of public feedback gathered through surveys, community meetings, and resident engagement sessions.

Planning began after the City of Hoboken acquired the site in 2023. A design team led by Dattner Architects developed concepts and gathered feedback from residents. The stated goal of the project is to create a contiguous waterfront park extending from Pier A near Hoboken Terminal north to Weehawken Cove.

The full park design includes an upgraded modern skatepark, an open-use lawn area, enlarged beach sections, and a children’s play area. Learning-focused components include a pier dedicated to marine education and a shoreline environment made up of tidal pools and marshland. The plan also includes a plaza influenced by the Castle Point bluffs, a community structure with indoor gathering areas and a rooftop viewing deck, and a continuation of the Hudson River Waterfront Walkway through the site.

Environmental performance and long-term durability are built into the design. Planned elements include native vegetation, rain-absorbing gardens, bioswales, and land shaping intended to handle future sea level rise. Along the water’s edge, the shoreline design incorporates rock sills, seawalls, and wave-reducing structures to limit erosion while creating transitional planted areas that support local wildlife and ecological health.

Phase One Construction Scope and Schedule

Project construction for Phase One will begin in earnest in the first quarter of 2026. Construction staging will include the installation of a temporary multi-use path for pedestrians and cyclists along Sinatra Drive following completion of the Waterfront Reconstruction Project.

Phase One includes the construction of a skatepark designed for all skill levels. Planned features include a six-foot half pipe pocket, a three- to four-foot flow bowl, a mini ramp, an additional three-foot mini ramp, beginner-friendly ledges, a Euro-gap, a flat rail, a four-stair with handrail, and a tech pad. These features were selected based on feedback from more than 150 skateboarders who participated in the public input process.

Additional Phase One components include lengthening the Hudson River Waterfront Walkway and building a public gathering space influenced by the nearby Castle Point bluffs. This area will feature stone and wood elements, places to sit, a drinking fountain, and clearly visible park signs. Phase One also provides for an educational plant nursery and a tree holding area that will be used to grow native vegetation for future stages of the park.

Funding, Labor, and Government Involvement

Hudson County invested $500,000 in Maritime Park through its Open Space Trust Fund. The fund was created under former Hudson County Executive Tom DeGise. The funding will help support project costs, including debt associated with the bond used to cover construction expenses.

The State of New Jersey provided $1 million in funding secured through the State Assembly. Construction of the project will use union labor, including members of the Laborers’ International Union of North America. Final project costs will be determined through the construction bidding process.

Holiday Square Market Continues at Magnolia Landing in Jersey City

By
Moses Lookman
-
Holiday Square Market

The Holiday Square Market is now underway at Magnolia Landing in Jersey City’s Journal Square, bringing a seasonal outdoor event to the neighborhood during the holiday season. The market runs through Dec. 28 and is located at 136 Magnolia Avenue, directly outside the entrance to Journal Squared and just steps from the Journal Square PATH Station.

Key Takeaways
  • The Holiday Square Market is open at Magnolia Landing in Jersey City’s Journal Square through Dec. 28, located at 136 Magnolia Avenue next to the Journal Square PATH Station and the Journal Squared entrance.
  • The New York City-style outdoor market features curated food vendors and merchants selling seasonal treats, crafts, toys, jewelry, and holiday gifts, with operating hours from 3 to 8 p.m. on weekdays and noon to 8 p.m. on weekends and holidays.
  • The event is presented by Jersey City-based KRE Group and produced by Festive Planet, with holiday stalls by Cabaret Tent and operational support from Commercial District Services through the Journal Square Special Improvement District.

New York City-Style Holiday Market Activates Magnolia Landing

Designed as a New York City-style outdoor holiday market, the Holiday Square Market transforms Magnolia Landing into a winter village with decorated stalls and festive music. Throughout the market, visitors can explore vendors offering seasonal food, snacks, and sweets. Shoppers can browse stalls selling decorative items, gifts for all ages, accessories, and seasonal stocking-sized presents.

The market operates Wednesday through Friday from 3 to 8 p.m. and from noon to 8 p.m. on weekends and holidays.

KRE Group and Community Partners Produce the Holiday Square Market

The Holiday Square Market is presented by Jersey City-based KRE Group and produced by Festive Planet. Temporary holiday stalls at the site are supplied by Cabaret Tent, while staffing and operational support are provided by Commercial District Services through the Journal Square Special Improvement District.

Magnolia Landing, which was developed by KRE Group, sits directly outside the Journal Square PATH station and the Journal Squared residential towers and is frequently used for seasonal events and public programming.

Scott Boras Confirms Crowded Market as Yankees Push to Keep Cody Bellinger

By
Paulius Kundzelevicius
-
Yankees Face Heavy Competition

The New York Yankees have made it clear that re-signing Cody Bellinger is their top offseason priority, but doing so will not be easy. In a free-agent market that is short on high-end outfield talent, Bellinger stands out as the most complete option available, and that has drawn strong interest from across the league. According to his agent, Scott Boras, multiple teams are lining up, which sets the stage for a highly competitive offseason decision.

Key Takeaways
  • Cody Bellinger is the Yankees’ top offseason target, but at least seven other teams are also pursuing him.
  • Agent Scott Boras confirmed wide league interest using his trademark wordplay at the winter meetings.
  • While the Yankees want Bellinger back, they are unlikely to repeat the type of bidding war they entered for Juan Soto last offseason

Scott Boras Confirms Widespread Interest Using His Trademark Wordplay

Speaking with reporters on Tuesday morning, Boras used a series of direct clues to identify the clubs involved without naming them outright. His wordplay referenced the Yankees, Mets, Dodgers, Phillies, Giants, Blue Jays, Angels, and Reds. “It’s not for me to JUDGE, but great players see RED if they lose, that they have a big bat YANKED out of their lineup,” Boras said. He continued with additional hints: “I haven’t MET a team that DODGES a five-tool player. To PHIL the center field need is a GIANT step towards the playoffs… there’s a lot of ANGEL investors looking for very versatile outfielders.”

Shortly after arriving in Orlando on Sunday night, Yankees general manager Brian Cashman confirmed that he had already spoken with Boras several times regarding Bellinger. “Cody Bellinger would be a great fit for us,” Cashman said, describing him as a talented player who can play multiple positions and hit all types of pitching.

Manager Aaron Boone added on Monday that Bellinger contributed both on and off the field. “Obviously, what Cody brought to us last year in so many ways… who he was in the room, his performance between the lines on both sides of the ball, his athleticism, his versatility, who wouldn’t want a player like that?”

Bellinger delivered a strong 2025 season after being acquired from the Chicago Cubs. He hit .272 with 29 home runs, 25 doubles, 98 RBIs, and 98 runs scored, while playing all three outfield positions and first base. His performance helped the Yankees finish 94–68, tied with the Toronto Blue Jays for the best record in the American League.

Sportsbooks Shift Odds Amid Bellinger Uncertainty

As teams began contacting Boras, sportsbooks adjusted their early 2026 futures boards. DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM, PointsBet, and Caesars consistently opened the Los Angeles Dodgers as favorites following their second straight World Series title, with odds generally placed between +340 and +370. The Yankees appeared immediately behind them, ranging from +700 to +850 depending on the sportsbook.

Oddsmakers also positioned the Yankees as the early American League favorites, listing them around +310 to +320 to win the AL pennant. These lines reflect Bellinger’s impact on both offense and defense and the role he played in last season’s 94–68 finish.

Bellinger’s decision to opt out of his $25 million option created further pricing movement. Some books posted “next team” odds that listed the Yankees as the early favorite, with the Dodgers, Mets, and Blue Jays close behind — the same clubs implied in Boras’ remarks. His individual futures adjusted as well, with at least one sportsbook placing him at +3000 in early MVP odds.

Yankees’ Strategy and Backup Options

Despite their interest, the Yankees are not planning to enter an unrestricted bidding battle. SNY’s Andy Martino explained that “this isn’t a Juan Soto thing where they’re just going to keep bidding and bidding and bidding.” Last offseason, the Yankees pursued Soto aggressively, bidding upwards of $760 million before he signed a 14-year, $765 million deal with the New York Mets.

Payroll has also been a subject of discussion after the Yankees spent $319 million last season, though Boras said he has not been told that spending is being limited. “I don’t think when Cash or Randy call me, they talk about limiting payroll,” Boras said. “They talk about acquiring players.”

If the Yankees are outbid, they do have alternatives. One option is shifting attention to Kyle Tucker, a 28-year-old outfielder the Yankees tried to trade for last winter before the Astros sent him to the Cubs in a deal that ultimately brought Bellinger to New York. Trade options remain on the table as well.

If no external move is made, Jasson Dominguez could enter spring training as the frontrunner to start in left field. The 22-year-old struggled with the position last season but would be given another opportunity. Top prospect Spencer Jones would also be part of that competition, though Dominguez would have the early edge.

Still, none of those options match Bellinger’s complete package. He remains the Yankees’ best and most desired solution, and his future will likely come down to how much New York is willing to spend compared to a growing list of rivals ready to compete for his signature.

Jersey City Cabaret to Present Its First Holiday Show at Art House Productions

By
Moses Lookman
-
Jersey City Cabaret Wraps Up

The Jersey City Cabaret, in partnership with Art House Productions, will present JERSEY CITY CABARET: THE HOLIDAY SHOW on Thursday, December 18, 2025. This event will serve as the final show of the year and invite audiences to experience holiday music performed by local artists.

Key Takeaways
  • The Jersey City Cabaret will hold its first Holiday Show on December 18, 2025, closing out its performance year.
  • The showcase began in November 2024 and has presented 12 shows with more than 50 singers and 300 songs across five Jersey City venues.
  • The Holiday Show will include seasonal music connected to many cultures and year-end traditions.

Jersey City Cabaret’s Second Year of Performances

The Cabaret is entering its second year as a monthly musical event. It brings singers and instrumentalists from across Jersey City and gives them a stage for pop, rock, jazz, musical theater, and more styles they choose.

For December, the Cabaret will focus on holiday music. The show will include festive classics, winter ballads, New Year songs, and seasonal selections from many cultural traditions. This performance will be the final chance to see the Cabaret in 2025, with the full lineup confirmed for the night.

How the Cabaret Started and What It Has Achieved

The Jersey City Cabaret was created in November 2024 to give local musicians a safe and welcoming place to perform. Since then, it has presented 12 full shows, appeared in five Jersey City venues, featured more than 50 singers, and delivered 300 songs.

The showcase was founded by Hannah Lee and is produced by Three Peas Productions, which includes Lee, Zach Mayo, and Lauren Kwei. Their mission is to support performers from all backgrounds and provide steady opportunities to share their work. The Holiday Show will also be the Cabaret’s first event at Art House Productions.

Holiday Show Details and Ticket Information

The Holiday Show will take place on Thursday, December 18, 2025, at Art House Productions, located at 345 Marin Boulevard, Jersey City, NJ. Doors open at 7:00 PM, and the performance begins at 7:30 PM.

Tickets are priced at $22.00 for online general admission, $27.00 at the door, and $35.00 for Supporter General Admission, available through the Art House Productions website.

ICE Arrests in NYC Rise: Understand the Citywide Consequences

By
Moses Lookman
-
ICE Arrests in NYC Surge

I’ve been following immigration enforcement in New York City closely this year, and what I’ve seen unfold has been dramatic enough to reshape how many people here navigate daily life.

Over the past few months, data, firsthand accounts, and community reports all show the same trend: ICE arrests in New York City have risen sharply. The pattern is changing, affecting a larger share of the immigrant population than before. In this article, I break down the numbers, enforcement changes, who’s affected, and what it means for NYC immigration.

A Surge That Can’t Be Ignored

Since January 2025, ICE arrests across the New York area have risen dramatically, with the total number of people detained exceeding the number of arrests for all of the previous year. Reports indicate that over the first half of 2025, a growing majority of those arrested, potentially reaching 73% or higher, had no criminal convictions. Before May 2025, ICE arrests leaned heavily toward individuals with criminal convictions or pending charges. But by mid-May, something changed.

ICE agents have started appearing inside courthouses, at required check-ins, and near legal-aid offices. These are places people normally visit to follow immigration rules. This shift meant that individuals who were doing what the system asked of them suddenly found themselves detained. By the first 10 days of June, reports say ICE agents made 495 arrests. It’s more than double the number for the entire month of June the previous year.

The composition of these arrests has shifted just as dramatically. Instead of focusing primarily on convicted offenders, ICE is now sweeping in many immigrants whose cases are purely civil in nature.

What Changed, and Why Now?

After reviewing data, public statements, and on-the-ground accounts, several factors seem to explain the spike in NYC ICE arrests:

  • Targeting of courthouses and check-ins: Starting in mid-May, ICE began treating these locations as active enforcement zones.
  • Federal enforcement realignment: The administration’s expanded interior-enforcement strategy has resulted in more agents, more operations, and fewer restrictions.
  • Prioritization of civil cases: Many recent NYC immigration arrests target individuals with outstanding immigration violations, not criminal charges.

This doesn’t look like a short-term enforcement push. It appears to represent a long-term recalibration in how ICE interacts with immigrant communities in New York City.

Who Is Affected: More Than Just “Criminal Aliens”

Policymakers claim they’re targeting “dangerous criminals,” but NYC immigration arrest data tells a more complex story. A growing majority of those arrested in 2025 have no criminal history at all. Instead, they’re individuals with pending asylum cases, expired visas, removal orders issued years ago, or unresolved paperwork.

Arrests increasingly occur at or near:

  • Immigration courts
  • Mandatory check-in centers
  • Government buildings
  • Public transit hubs

This puts even long-time residents — people who work, raise families, and pay taxes — at risk. The idea that “only criminals need to worry” simply no longer matches the ground reality.

Historical Context: How Today’s ICE Activity Compares to Previous Years

To understand the gravity of the current surge, I looked back at enforcement trends over the past decade. The contrast is stark.

Between 2016 and 2019, ICE activity rose nationwide, but New York City’s sanctuary-city policies limited cooperation with federal officers. Arrests happened, but they were more targeted and often data-driven. In 2020-2022, ICE activity fell sharply due to COVID restrictions, court closures, and shifting federal priorities. Arrests during those years were historically low.

Between 2023 and 2024, enforcement activity ticked upward, but NYC ICE arrests remained lower than pre-2020 levels. Non-criminal enforcement was still relatively restrained. Then 2025 arrived — and within just six months, NYC immigration arrests surpassed the totals of many previous years.

Understanding this history matters because it shows this isn’t a routine cyclical spike. It represents an intentional, coordinated escalation that breaks from nearly a decade of New York’s enforcement norms.

Consequences for Deportations, Bond, & Detention

The ripple effect of rising arrests is visible across detention centers and immigration courts. More detainees lead to additional bond hearings and longer case timelines. This adds pressure to courts that are already backlogged.

Recent data show the median bond amount in New York dropped from about $6,500 in January to roughly $3,500 by June 2025. While that makes release more accessible for many, it also reflects the growing number of cases judges now must handle.

But it’s important to note that deportations haven’t risen at the same rate. Many people remain in custody or in months-long removal proceedings. Families are separated, households disrupted, and uncertainty grows as people wait for their day in court.

Voices from the Ground: Fear, Uncertainty, & Community Impact

Walking through neighborhoods like Jackson Heights, Sunset Park, and Mott Haven over the past months, I’ve heard the same stories again and again. People are afraid to leave their homes for anything involving government buildings.

Adam told me they had plans for the upcoming Hoboken Holiday Market Series and Fireworks Yacht Party, but he is now worried. Routine tasks like picking up court papers, attending asylum check-ins, even walking into a school building now feel risky. With the increase in crime in Midtown West, immigrants in the area are growing more concerned.

Parents have told me they have backup guardians designated for their children “just in case” they don’t return home one day. Others speak of carrying documents or attorney information on them at all times. The emotional and psychological pressure is heavy, and it’s reshaping how immigrant communities engage with the city around them.

Political Reactions: Local vs. Federal Conflict

The rise in ICE arrests has triggered a political clash between New York City leadership and federal authorities. Local officials argue that courthouse arrests undermine trust, discourage cooperation with law enforcement, and erode the integrity of the justice system.

New York’s sanctuary policies restrict city agencies from aiding ICE, but those protections don’t prevent federal officers from acting independently. What we’re seeing now is a kind of “shadow jurisdiction” — a federal presence that operates parallel to city policy, often contradicting it.

State lawmakers have demanded explanations, while federal officials insist they’re enforcing the law as written. The tension between these two perspectives is growing, and NYC may soon become a legal battleground over the limits of federal immigration power.

Impact on Families and Children

One of the most heartbreaking aspects of this surge is its effect on families — especially children. I’ve spoken to educators who say some students suddenly fear coming to school. Counselors report rising anxiety among kids worried their parents might not be home when they return at the end of the day.

For mixed-status households, every knock at the door becomes a moment of panic. Families have created emergency plans: who to call, where to go, how to access important documents, and how to prepare children for the possibility of sudden separation.

What Immigrants Are Doing to Protect Themselves

As enforcement intensified, communities have adapted. I’ve noticed several trends:

  • Safety planning: Families keep documents, attorney numbers, and power-of-attorney forms accessible.
  • Avoidance of high-risk locations: Some immigrants choose to skip check-ins or reschedule court dates if they sense danger.
  • Legal preparedness: More people are seeking consultations, even if they don’t yet have active cases.
  • Know-your-rights training: Community groups are hosting packed workshops on how to respond if ICE approaches.
  • Encrypted communication: Some rely on group chats, messaging apps, or neighborhood alert networks to share real-time warnings of ICE activity.

These actions show resilience. They also reveal a troubling reality: many immigrants feel they must protect themselves from the system meant to oversee their cases.

Broader National Implications

Although New York is receiving significant attention, this surge isn’t isolated. ICE has increased operations in cities like Chicago, Los Angeles, and Houston. They target courthouses, transit hubs, and other key locations, even in sanctuary cities.

NYC, however, stands out as a kind of test case. If federal authorities can execute large-scale interior enforcement in a city with strong historic immigrant advocacy, similar strategies may roll out nationwide.

If New York’s legal and community systems struggle to keep up, smaller cities may be hit even harder. What happens in NYC could shape the future of federal immigration enforcement across the country.

Looking Ahead — What to Watch For

As I continue monitoring NYC ICE arrests and broader enforcement trends, there are several questions I can’t help but ask:

  • Will the arrest surge continue into next year, or will court challenges slow it down?
  • How will NYC balance sanctuary principles with a federal government ramping up enforcement?
  • Will deportations eventually rise in proportion to arrests, or will detention facilities become even more overwhelmed?
  • What long-term effects will this have on immigrant participation in schools, healthcare, and city programs?

The answers will shape not just policy but the everyday lives of hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers.

FAQs

With ICE arrests rising in NYC, uncertainty is growing in immigrant communities. I’ve noticed the same questions keep coming up — from families, advocates, and local New Yorkers wanting clarity on ICE actions. The FAQs below address the most common points of confusion and provide a clear, accessible snapshot of what residents are trying to make sense of during this moment.

Why Are ICE Arrests Rising so Sharply in NYC Now?

The surge stems from mid-2025 changes in enforcement strategy, expanded federal authority, and new operations at courthouses and check-ins.

Are Most of Those Arrested Criminals?

No. A growing majority of those arrested have no criminal record.

What Happens After Someone Is Arrested?

Many are detained, and bond hearings have increased. Deportations haven’t grown proportionately, leaving many in prolonged proceedings.

Are Arrests Happening Only in Neighborhoods?

No — ICE is increasingly active at courthouses, check-ins, and government buildings.

How Is This Affecting Families?

Fear, stress, and uncertainty are widespread, especially among children and mixed-status households.

Could Arrests Rise Even Further?

Yes. If current policies continue, NYC and other major cities could see even higher arrest numbers.

New York’s Cellphone Ban in Schools Off to a Promising Start

By
Moses Lookman
-
New York’s Cellphone Ban in Schools

I first noticed just how distracting phones had become when I visited a local classroom—students were glued to their screens, barely engaging with the lesson. That’s why New York’s cellphone ban in schools immediately caught my eye. The policy, rolled out January 6, 2025, aims to limit in-class phone use across public schools.

From the early reports, I’ve seen that the ban has already changed how students interact, how teachers manage classrooms, and how learning feels day to day. Below, I’ll share what the numbers say. I’ll also look at what teachers and students are experiencing.

Early Numbers: What I Found Interesting

Recent surveys show that 83% of schools report more positive classroom engagement. By comparison, nationwide, 77% of schools already have some restrictions. I was surprised to see such a dramatic drop in reported distractions after just a few months.

Walking past classrooms, I noticed students paying more attention and fewer heads buried in phones. Teachers shared that lessons feel smoother and quieter now. Even in hallways, the usual phone chatter seemed to have slowed.

Voices From the Classroom: What Teachers, Parents, and Students Say

At Liberty High School in New York City, I immediately felt a different mood. In the cafeteria during lunch, students weren’t staring at screens. They were laughing, chatting, and even playing card games. To me, it’s a small but telling sign that the cellphone ban may be doing its job.

  • Teachers: One teacher told me that lessons now “move smoothly,” with fewer students glancing at their phones or whispering while trying to scroll. Several educators reported that managing class feels less like a struggle and more like teaching. This echoes findings from research reporting more positive classroom environments and improved student engagement.
  • Parents: I encountered mixed feelings. Almost unanimously, they praised the improved focus. One mother explained that she supports the ban overall but asked the school to offer a reliable way for kids to contact their families if necessary. The concern is common: with phones locked away all day, communication becomes tricky.
  • Students: Some students expressed relief at not feeling tied to their phones all day and said they enjoyed being able to talk in person again. Others resented the loss of easy access to social media or messaging during free periods. Still, one student admitted: “I didn’t expect to enjoy lunch this much—we actually talk now instead of sitting alone.” That shift, small as it seems, felt powerful to me during my visit.

Research Beyond New York: My Take on Global Evidence

Looking beyond New York, there’s mounting evidence from around the world that school cellphone bans can have real academic and behavioral benefits. For example:

  • In the Netherlands, a government‑commissioned study of 317 high schools found that after a nationwide ban on mobile phones, 75% of secondary schools reported improved student concentration, about 59% noted a better social climate, and roughly one‑third observed improved academic performance [1].
  • A large‑scale analysis in England, spanning 91 schools between 2001 and 2013, concluded that banning mobile phones had a measurable effect. Test scores rose by about 6.4% of a standard deviation, making students roughly 2 percentage points more likely to pass final exams. It brought strong gains among low‑achieving and disadvantaged students [2].
  • More recently in late 2025, a working paper studying a major Florida school district reported that two years after a full‑day cellphone ban, student test scores improved significantly, especially in middle and high schools, and unexcused absences dropped notably [3].

During my own NYC high school visits to schools, I witnessed results that echoed this data—classrooms felt calmer, students seemed more engaged, and distractions appeared reduced. Global studies and personal observations suggest that the benefits of banning phones often go beyond theory and can translate to improvements.

Challenges I Noticed in Implementation

Implementing New York’s cellphone ban in schools isn’t without hurdles. Discipline can be tricky—students risk suspensions, which may disproportionately affect disadvantaged students.

Equity is another concern. Some students rely on phones to stay in touch with family after school, making strict bans complicated. Enforcement also takes effort. Schools need space to store devices and staff to monitor compliance. I could see why some principals were nervous. It’s one thing to implement the ban, and another to manage it fairly every day.

What This Means: From My Perspective

Early signs from the New York City school cellphone ban are encouraging. Classrooms seem calmer, and students appear more engaged with lessons.

There’s long-term potential too. Reducing screen distractions could improve mental health and help students focus academically. But there are risks. Uneven enforcement might frustrate students or create inequities between schools.

Recommendations: If I Were Making the Call

For New York’s cellphone ban in schools to succeed, it needs mental‑health support and safe ways for students to contact their families. This is also a challenge to the new leadership of the Bayonne Board of Education.

Schools should monitor outcomes like test scores, attendance, and discipline to see how the policy is working in practice. Encouraging activities that replace phone use—clubs, arts, sports—can help students stay engaged without screens. Equity is key. All students need fair access to storage and consistent enforcement. From my perspective, “I’d treat this as a gradual culture change, not just a rule to enforce overnight.”

My Takeaway on New York’s Cellphone Ban in Schools

It’s important to recognize the limitations—New York’s cellphone ban in schools isn’t a magic bullet. No single policy can solve all classroom challenges. As Jersey schools also ban technology in the classroom, positive outcomes are expected to follow.

At the same time, the early results are encouraging: classrooms feel calmer, students appear more engaged, and teachers report fewer disruptions. Visiting schools in NYC, I saw students actually interacting during lunch instead of staring at screens, which was a small but meaningful change.

FAQs: What to Know About New York’s School Cellphone Ban

Curious about how New York’s cellphone ban in schools works and what it means for students, teachers, and parents? This FAQ answers the key questions and highlights important details about the new policy.

What Exactly Does the Ban Prohibit?

The law bans the use of personal smartphones and all internet‑enabled devices (phones, tablets, smartwatches, etc.) on school grounds during the entire school day—from the morning bell to dismissal.

When Does New York City’s School Cellphone Ban Take Effect?

The policy applies statewide starting the 2025–26 school year. School districts had until August 1, 2025, to finalize their “bell-to-bell” cellphone policies.

Does the Ban Apply Even During Lunch, Study Hall, or Passing Periods?

Yes. The restriction covers all instructional and non-instructional times: class, lunch, study hall, hallways, and passing periods.

How Will Schools Handle Storage of Phones During the Day?

Each school can choose its own storage method—lockers, lockboxes, or specialized pouches. Governor Hochul allocated $13.5 million to help schools buy storage equipment if needed.

Will Parents Still Be Able to Contact Their Children During School Hours?

Yes. Schools are required to provide a way for parents or guardians to reach their child during the school day when necessary.

Are There Concerns or Downsides to New York’s Cellphone Ban in Schools?

Some concerns include the impact on students who rely on phones for after‑school communication. Schools face logistical burdens like storage, supervision, and fair enforcement. There is also a risk of unequal discipline if rules are applied inconsistently.

Is This Ban Permanent or Will the Law Be Reviewed?

The law requires schools to adopt compliant policies and to publish an annual report, including data on enforcement and any disciplinary actions, including demographic breakdowns. This transparency may influence future reviews.

References:

  1. Kohnstamm Instituut, 2025. Monitoringsonderzoek Landelijke Afspraak Mobiele Telefoons En Andere Devices, open.overheid.nl/documenten/54c01e11-5a20-4779-9243-f4ed5fda1c9f/file.
  2. Louis-Philippe Beland, and Richard Murphy. “Ill Communication: Technology, Distraction & Student Performance.” Centre for Economic Performance, cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/dp1350.pdf.
  3. David N. Figlio, and Umut Özek. “THE IMPACT OF CELLPHONE BANS IN SCHOOLS ON STUDENT OUTCOMES: EVIDENCE FROM FLORIDA.” NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES, Oct. 2025.

Starbucks to Pay $35M to NYC Workers Over Labor Law Violations

By
Moses Lookman
-
Starbucks to Pay $35M to NYC Workers

I’ve been following the headlines closely, and I found the announcement that Starbucks will pay $35M to NYC workers significant. This isn’t just another corporate settlement. City officials are calling it the largest worker-protection settlement in New York City’s history.

This is much more than a dollar figure. It speaks to labor rights, corporate responsibility, and the daily realities of hourly workers. I want to reflect on what this settlement could mean for both employees and employers. In the sections ahead, I’ll break down the investigation, the settlement, how workers are reacting, and what these changes could signal for the future.

What Did the Investigation Find and How Did We Get Here?

It all began with worker complaints. According to the city’s Department of Consumer and Worker Protection (DCWP), as early as 2022, hundreds of hourly employees at more than 300 Starbucks locations across New York City began raising concerns. They said schedules were unpredictable, hours were cut arbitrarily, and extra shifts were often blocked.

The investigation found that, over three years, from July 2021 to July 2024, Starbucks racked up over 500,000 violations of New York City’s Fair Workweek Law. The law is meant to protect fast-food and retail workers from chaotic schedules and unfair cuts to their shifts. Investigators say Starbucks repeatedly violated those basic protections.

Worker Experiences & the Human Impact

Workers reportedly were kept in “involuntary part-time” status, even when they wanted more hours. They were denied shift pickups, had hours cut with little notice, and often lacked guaranteed weekly hours. For workers trying to pay rent, manage childcare, or maintain other jobs, this was devastating.

I spoke with Maria, a barista in Manhattan, who told me, “Some weeks I’d be scheduled for 30 hours, and the next week barely 10. I never knew if I could pay my rent or even get to my second job.”

Jamal, who’s worked at a Brooklyn Starbucks for four years, shared, “I kept asking for more hours. They’d always say no, and then hire new people instead. It felt like my commitment didn’t matter at all.”

To many workers, this meant unstable income, unpredictability, and a sense of being undervalued. As complaints piled up, pressure mounted, eventually forcing city regulators and Starbucks executives to confront the depth of the issue.

The Settlement: “Starbucks to Pay $35M to NYC Workers”—What That Means

When the settlement was announced on December 1, 2025, the headline was clear: Starbucks to pay $35M to NYC workers.

Here are the key numbers and terms of the agreement:

  • The deal covers over 15,000 hourly workers employed at Starbucks locations in New York City between July 2021 and July 2024.
  • Eligible workers will receive $50 for each week worked during that period.
  • In addition to payouts to workers, Starbucks will pay about $3.4 million in civil penalties and administrative costs.
  • The total settlement sums to roughly $38.9 million, with about $35.5 million going to workers.
  • Workers laid off during store closures will be given the chance for reinstatement at other locations.

To put it in perspective, an employee who worked consistently through those three years could receive several thousand dollars, depending on their eligible weeks.

As part of the settlement, Starbucks has also agreed to comply with the city’s scheduling law going forward. This means future schedules for Starbucks workers in NYC should be more stable and predictable.

Carlos, a part-time shift supervisor, told me, “This settlement shows that our voices do count. It’s validation for all the stress, missed hours, and financial instability we’ve faced.”

Why This Settlement Matters

This resolution feels like more than just a check in the mail. Here’s why I think Starbucks paying $35M to NYC workers is a landmark moment.

It Validates Worker Complaints

Too often, hourly workers in retail or food service are told that unpredictable scheduling or last-minute shift cuts are part of the business. This settlement pushes back. It recognizes that unstable scheduling isn’t just an inconvenience—it’s a real problem with real consequences.

Lena, a barista affected by the scheduling cuts, said, “Even $50 a week for the hours I worked over the years makes a difference. It won’t fix everything, but it’s a start—finally feeling like someone is listening.”

It Sets a Precedent for Corporate Accountability

When a multinational corporation like Starbucks faces sanctions for labor-law violations and ends up paying millions, it sends a signal. Other companies with similar schedules or staffing practices are likely to take notice. Violating worker-protection laws may no longer be treated as “just a cost of doing business.”

It May Encourage Organizing & Unionization

This settlement coincides with a broader wave of labor activism at Starbucks locations nationwide. The pressure workers put on the company seems to be paying off. Now that city law can be enforced, other workers may feel empowered to speak up or unionize, knowing their concerns can have an impact.

It Gives Real Relief to Many Workers—While Highlighting Systemic Issues

Yes, $50 per week worked isn’t earth-shattering, but for workers juggling multiple jobs or irregular hours, it can make a real difference. It may help cover overdue rent, pay bills, or offer a small cushion in a tough month.

Carlos added, “This payout doesn’t just put money in my pocket—it sends a message that companies can’t treat us like expendable labor.” “I’ve worked in several restaurants in Hoboken, but Starbucks was by far the most hectic,” said Lina.

At the same time, the need for a settlement of this size highlights how precarious hourly work remains. Erratic scheduling wasn’t isolated—it was systemic.

Reactions From Workers, Union Supporters, & Others

Since the announcement, reactions have been mixed, but many workers and labor supporters have hailed the settlement as a win.

Keisha, a barista in Queens, said, “I’ve been at Starbucks for six years, and I’ve never seen anything like this. It feels good to know the city is holding them accountable. We aren’t just numbers on a schedule anymore.”

Some expressed frustration at the perceived scale of the payout:

“Finally, some accountability. But $35M seems light for years of violations.” — Reddit user

Others questioned whether the payout would truly change things:

“Settlement doesn’t mean victory … they’re paying enough money to make the problem go away.” — Reddit user

Union supporters and some politicians emphasized that while the settlement is important, it doesn’t end the fight over wages, staffing, and working conditions.

“These are not demands of greed — these are demands of decency.” — Reddit user

For many, the payout feels like a small but meaningful step—a reminder that worker complaints must be taken seriously.

What This Means for Other Employers and the Service Sector

In my view, this settlement could influence how other large employers—especially those with hourly, shift-based workforces—handle scheduling and labor compliance.

Here’s what I see happening:

  • Stricter internal compliance systems: Employers may invest in better scheduling software and oversight.
  • Greater worker awareness and empowerment: Employees may feel more confident reporting unfair practices.
  • Potential for more regulatory scrutiny: Other cities might adopt similar enforcement measures.
  • Shifts in public and consumer perception: Customers may consider labor practices when choosing where to shop.

For the broader service sector, where unstable schedules have long been the norm, this case could mark the start of a shift toward accountability.

What I’ll Be Watching Next

Even though the settlement has been announced, I’m paying close attention to what happens now. The agreement is only as good as its implementation.

Here’s what I’ll be watching:

  • Whether Starbucks actually improves scheduling practices: It’s one thing to agree on paper, another to deliver reliable shifts.
  • Whether other cities follow NYC’s lead: If enforcement works, other municipalities may investigate similar issues.
  • Whether workers continue to organize and demand broader reforms: Scheduling is just one concern; wages, staffing, and benefits remain critical.
  • How large retailers respond: Will they proactively change policies, or resist, hoping settlements remain cheaper than real reform?

I believe this story doesn’t end with a check. It ends with whether corporations, regulators, and workers learn—and improve—from it.

Conclusion

When I think about the headline “Starbucks to pay $35M to NYC workers”, I don’t just see dollars. I see validation. I see a message: in one of the world’s biggest cities, even hourly workers deserve dignity, fairness, and predictable schedules.

I see a precedent—that laws meant to protect workers can be enforced, even against corporate giants. I see a potential shift for an entire industry that long treated erratic scheduling as a cost of doing business. And I see hope—hope that workers will be heard, that mistakes will be corrected, and that justice can come in the form of overdue paychecks and real change.

James Solomon Wins Jersey City Mayor’s Runoff Over Jim McGreevey

By
Moses Lookman
-
James Solomon Defeats Jim McGreevey

James Solomon has been elected mayor of Jersey City after defeating former New Jersey Gov. Jim McGreevey in a runoff election held Tuesday. With 93% of votes counted, Solomon led with 68% compared to McGreevey’s 32%, according to election results. The Associated Press projected the outcome less than an hour after polls closed. About 33,000 voters participated.

Key Takeaways
  • James Solomon won the Jersey City mayoral runoff with 68% of the vote, while Jim McGreevey received 32%.
  • The runoff followed a Nov. 4 election in which seven candidates competed, and none reached 50%.
  • Housing affordability, rent control, taxes, development, and public safety dominated the campaign.

How the Election Reached a Runoff and Why the Race Drew Attention

The runoff election followed the Nov. 4 general election, when seven candidates ran for mayor, and none received more than 50% of the vote. In that first round, Solomon finished first with 29% of the vote, while McGreevey placed second with 25%. Both candidates are Democrats, although party affiliation did not appear on the ballot.

The contest was viewed as a choice between Jersey City’s Democratic establishment and its progressive base. McGreevey entered the race with backing from Hudson County political leaders, though that support largely faded after his second-place finish. Solomon gained endorsements from three candidates eliminated in the first round, as well as support from U.S. Sen. Andy Kim and Newark Mayor Ras Baraka.

Solomon described the outcome as a victory against entrenched political power and stated that the election sent a message that Jersey City residents could not be influenced by developers or special interests. He pledged to lead as a mayor focused on residents rather than political insiders.

Solomon’s Political Background and Policy Priorities

Solomon is 41 years old and was first elected to the Jersey City Council in 2017, representing neighborhoods that include downtown and the waterfront. During a debate last month, he said that, as mayor, he plans to improve city schools, implement new rent controls, and oversee the development of additional affordable housing.

His platform focused heavily on cost-of-living concerns, particularly those linked to new development aimed at affluent commuters from New York City. Solomon argued that Jersey City has built a large amount of housing but has absorbed unmet demand created by New York City’s failure to build enough homes.

In addition to housing policies, Solomon has said he plans to hire 100 new police officers and supports the creation of a civilian complaint review board similar to New York City’s police oversight agency.

Solomon grew up in Millburn and earned a master’s degree from Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government. He previously worked as an aide to former Boston Mayor Thomas Menino. He moved to Jersey City in 2013 and is a married father of three.

In 2015, about a month after his wedding, Solomon was diagnosed with Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Now in full remission, he has said the experience influenced his decision to pursue public office, citing the support he received from Jersey City during that time.

Jim McGreevey’s Return to Politics and Concession

McGreevey, 68, returned to electoral politics for the first time in more than two decades during this mayoral race. A Jersey City native, he previously served as a state assemblyman, mayor of Woodbridge, and governor of New Jersey. He was elected governor in 2001 and resigned in 2004 after admitting to an extramarital affair with a man he had hired as an aide.

His resignation was also tied to controversy over his decision to appoint Golan Cipel, a former Israeli naval officer, as New Jersey’s homeland security adviser in 2002 despite Cipel lacking proper qualifications and being unable to obtain required security clearances.

After leaving office, McGreevey stepped away from electoral politics and later returned to Jersey City more than a decade ago, where he managed a prison reentry program. This election is the first time in over 20 years that his name appeared on a New Jersey ballot.

Following the runoff, McGreevey conceded defeat, congratulated Solomon, and said he does not plan to run for public office again.

Affordability, Housing, and Safety at the Center of the Campaign

Affordability emerged as the defining issue of the runoff election. On Election Day, both candidates traveled through Jersey City neighborhoods during rainy conditions to encourage residents to vote.

Solomon focused his message on limiting rent increases and holding developers accountable for building affordable housing. McGreevey emphasized requiring that 20% of new market-rate housing developments include affordable units within the same buildings.

Voter concerns centered on these issues. Jersey City resident Mike Liu said property taxes rose by approximately 20% to 30% in 2022. Another resident, Nisrit Osman, said affordability had declined to the point where multiple household incomes are often necessary to support one home.

The candidates also exchanged criticism over responsibility for rising property taxes. McGreevey said property taxes rose significantly while Solomon was in the city government. Solomon countered by blaming developers and political leaders, whom he said supported McGreevey.

Despite sharp disagreements, both candidates said the city needs safer streets and more police officers.

Transition of Leadership at City Hall

Solomon will take office in January, succeeding Mayor Steve Fulop. Fulop is stepping down after three terms following an unsuccessful run for the Democratic nomination for governor in June and plans to lead a business advocacy group.

123...165Page 1 of 165

Latest News

Maritime Park

Hoboken Breaks Ground on 8.7-Acre Maritime Park Waterfront Project

Moses Lookman -
On December 10, the City of Hoboken began construction on Maritime Park, an 8.7-acre waterfront park located at the former Union Dry Dock site...
Holiday Square Market

Holiday Square Market Continues at Magnolia Landing in Jersey City

Moses Lookman -
The Holiday Square Market is now underway at Magnolia Landing in Jersey City’s Journal Square, bringing a seasonal outdoor event to the neighborhood during...
Jersey City Cabaret Wraps Up

Jersey City Cabaret to Present Its First Holiday Show at Art...

Moses Lookman -
The Jersey City Cabaret, in partnership with Art House Productions, will present JERSEY CITY CABARET: THE HOLIDAY SHOW on Thursday, December 18, 2025. This...
ICE Arrests in NYC Surge

ICE Arrests in NYC Rise: Understand the Citywide Consequences

Moses Lookman -
I’ve been following immigration enforcement in New York City closely this year, and what I’ve seen unfold has been dramatic enough to reshape how...
New York’s Cellphone Ban in Schools

New York’s Cellphone Ban in Schools Off to a Promising Start

Moses Lookman -
I first noticed just how distracting phones had become when I visited a local classroom—students were glued to their screens, barely engaging with the...