ICE Arrests in NYC Rise: Understand the Citywide Consequences

December 15, 2025

I’ve been following immigration enforcement in New York City closely this year, and what I’ve seen unfold has been dramatic enough to reshape how many people here navigate daily life.

Over the past few months, data, firsthand accounts, and community reports all show the same trend: ICE arrests in New York City have risen sharply. The pattern is changing, affecting a larger share of the immigrant population than before. In this article, I break down the numbers, enforcement changes, who’s affected, and what it means for NYC immigration.

A Surge That Can’t Be Ignored

Since January 2025, ICE arrests across the New York area have risen dramatically, with the total number of people detained exceeding the number of arrests for all of the previous year. Reports indicate that over the first half of 2025, a growing majority of those arrested, potentially reaching 73% or higher, had no criminal convictions. Before May 2025, ICE arrests leaned heavily toward individuals with criminal convictions or pending charges. But by mid-May, something changed.

ICE agents have started appearing inside courthouses, at required check-ins, and near legal-aid offices. These are places people normally visit to follow immigration rules. This shift meant that individuals who were doing what the system asked of them suddenly found themselves detained. By the first 10 days of June, reports say ICE agents made 495 arrests. It’s more than double the number for the entire month of June the previous year.

The composition of these arrests has shifted just as dramatically. Instead of focusing primarily on convicted offenders, ICE is now sweeping in many immigrants whose cases are purely civil in nature.

What Changed, and Why Now?

After reviewing data, public statements, and on-the-ground accounts, several factors seem to explain the spike in NYC ICE arrests:

Targeting of courthouses and check-ins: Starting in mid-May, ICE began treating these locations as active enforcement zones.
Federal enforcement realignment: The administration’s expanded interior-enforcement strategy has resulted in more agents, more operations, and fewer restrictions.
Prioritization of civil cases: Many recent NYC immigration arrests target individuals with outstanding immigration violations, not criminal charges.

This doesn’t look like a short-term enforcement push. It appears to represent a long-term recalibration in how ICE interacts with immigrant communities in New York City.

Who Is Affected: More Than Just “Criminal Aliens”

Policymakers claim they’re targeting “dangerous criminals,” but NYC immigration arrest data tells a more complex story. A growing majority of those arrested in 2025 have no criminal history at all. Instead, they’re individuals with pending asylum cases, expired visas, removal orders issued years ago, or unresolved paperwork.

Arrests increasingly occur at or near:

Immigration courts
Mandatory check-in centers
Government buildings
Public transit hubs

This puts even long-time residents — people who work, raise families, and pay taxes — at risk. The idea that “only criminals need to worry” simply no longer matches the ground reality.

Historical Context: How Today’s ICE Activity Compares to Previous Years

To understand the gravity of the current surge, I looked back at enforcement trends over the past decade. The contrast is stark.

Between 2016 and 2019, ICE activity rose nationwide, but New York City’s sanctuary-city policies limited cooperation with federal officers. Arrests happened, but they were more targeted and often data-driven. In 2020-2022, ICE activity fell sharply due to COVID restrictions, court closures, and shifting federal priorities. Arrests during those years were historically low.

Between 2023 and 2024, enforcement activity ticked upward, but NYC ICE arrests remained lower than pre-2020 levels. Non-criminal enforcement was still relatively restrained. Then 2025 arrived — and within just six months, NYC immigration arrests surpassed the totals of many previous years.

Understanding this history matters because it shows this isn’t a routine cyclical spike. It represents an intentional, coordinated escalation that breaks from nearly a decade of New York’s enforcement norms.

Consequences for Deportations, Bond, & Detention

The ripple effect of rising arrests is visible across detention centers and immigration courts. More detainees lead to additional bond hearings and longer case timelines. This adds pressure to courts that are already backlogged.

Recent data show the median bond amount in New York dropped from about $6,500 in January to roughly $3,500 by June 2025. While that makes release more accessible for many, it also reflects the growing number of cases judges now must handle.

But it’s important to note that deportations haven’t risen at the same rate. Many people remain in custody or in months-long removal proceedings. Families are separated, households disrupted, and uncertainty grows as people wait for their day in court.

Voices from the Ground: Fear, Uncertainty, & Community Impact

Walking through neighborhoods like Jackson Heights, Sunset Park, and Mott Haven over the past months, I’ve heard the same stories again and again. People are afraid to leave their homes for anything involving government buildings.

Adam told me they had plans for the upcoming Hoboken Holiday Market Series and Fireworks Yacht Party, but he is now worried. Routine tasks like picking up court papers, attending asylum check-ins, even walking into a school building now feel risky. With the increase in crime in Midtown West, immigrants in the area are growing more concerned.

Parents have told me they have backup guardians designated for their children “just in case” they don’t return home one day. Others speak of carrying documents or attorney information on them at all times. The emotional and psychological pressure is heavy, and it’s reshaping how immigrant communities engage with the city around them.

Political Reactions: Local vs. Federal Conflict

The rise in ICE arrests has triggered a political clash between New York City leadership and federal authorities. Local officials argue that courthouse arrests undermine trust, discourage cooperation with law enforcement, and erode the integrity of the justice system.

New York’s sanctuary policies restrict city agencies from aiding ICE, but those protections don’t prevent federal officers from acting independently. What we’re seeing now is a kind of “shadow jurisdiction” — a federal presence that operates parallel to city policy, often contradicting it.

State lawmakers have demanded explanations, while federal officials insist they’re enforcing the law as written. The tension between these two perspectives is growing, and NYC may soon become a legal battleground over the limits of federal immigration power.

Impact on Families and Children

One of the most heartbreaking aspects of this surge is its effect on families — especially children. I’ve spoken to educators who say some students suddenly fear coming to school. Counselors report rising anxiety among kids worried their parents might not be home when they return at the end of the day.

For mixed-status households, every knock at the door becomes a moment of panic. Families have created emergency plans: who to call, where to go, how to access important documents, and how to prepare children for the possibility of sudden separation.

What Immigrants Are Doing to Protect Themselves

As enforcement intensified, communities have adapted. I’ve noticed several trends:

Safety planning: Families keep documents, attorney numbers, and power-of-attorney forms accessible.
Avoidance of high-risk locations: Some immigrants choose to skip check-ins or reschedule court dates if they sense danger.
Legal preparedness: More people are seeking consultations, even if they don’t yet have active cases.
Know-your-rights training: Community groups are hosting packed workshops on how to respond if ICE approaches.
Encrypted communication: Some rely on group chats, messaging apps, or neighborhood alert networks to share real-time warnings of ICE activity.

These actions show resilience. They also reveal a troubling reality: many immigrants feel they must protect themselves from the system meant to oversee their cases.

Broader National Implications

Although New York is receiving significant attention, this surge isn’t isolated. ICE has increased operations in cities like Chicago, Los Angeles, and Houston. They target courthouses, transit hubs, and other key locations, even in sanctuary cities.

NYC, however, stands out as a kind of test case. If federal authorities can execute large-scale interior enforcement in a city with strong historic immigrant advocacy, similar strategies may roll out nationwide.

If New York’s legal and community systems struggle to keep up, smaller cities may be hit even harder. What happens in NYC could shape the future of federal immigration enforcement across the country.

Looking Ahead — What to Watch For

As I continue monitoring NYC ICE arrests and broader enforcement trends, there are several questions I can’t help but ask:

Will the arrest surge continue into next year, or will court challenges slow it down?
How will NYC balance sanctuary principles with a federal government ramping up enforcement?
Will deportations eventually rise in proportion to arrests, or will detention facilities become even more overwhelmed?
What long-term effects will this have on immigrant participation in schools, healthcare, and city programs?

The answers will shape not just policy but the everyday lives of hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers.

FAQs

With ICE arrests rising in NYC, uncertainty is growing in immigrant communities. I’ve noticed the same questions keep coming up — from families, advocates, and local New Yorkers wanting clarity on ICE actions. The FAQs below address the most common points of confusion and provide a clear, accessible snapshot of what residents are trying to make sense of during this moment.

Why Are ICE Arrests Rising so Sharply in NYC Now?

The surge stems from mid-2025 changes in enforcement strategy, expanded federal authority, and new operations at courthouses and check-ins.

Are Most of Those Arrested Criminals?

No. A growing majority of those arrested have no criminal record.

What Happens After Someone Is Arrested?

Many are detained, and bond hearings have increased. Deportations haven’t grown proportionately, leaving many in prolonged proceedings.

Are Arrests Happening Only in Neighborhoods?

No — ICE is increasingly active at courthouses, check-ins, and government buildings.

How Is This Affecting Families?

Fear, stress, and uncertainty are widespread, especially among children and mixed-status households.

Could Arrests Rise Even Further?

Yes. If current policies continue, NYC and other major cities could see even higher arrest numbers.

New York’s Cellphone Ban in Schools Off to a Promising Start

Moses Lookman

December 15, 2025

I first noticed just how distracting phones had become when I visited a local classroom—students were glued to their screens, barely engaging with the lesson. That’s why New York’s cellphone ban in schools immediately caught my eye. The policy, rolled out January 6, 2025, aims to limit in-class phone use across public schools.

From the early reports, I’ve seen that the ban has already changed how students interact, how teachers manage classrooms, and how learning feels day to day. Below, I’ll share what the numbers say. I’ll also look at what teachers and students are experiencing.

Early Numbers: What I Found Interesting

Recent surveys show that 83% of schools report more positive classroom engagement. By comparison, nationwide, 77% of schools already have some restrictions. I was surprised to see such a dramatic drop in reported distractions after just a few months.

Walking past classrooms, I noticed students paying more attention and fewer heads buried in phones. Teachers shared that lessons feel smoother and quieter now. Even in hallways, the usual phone chatter seemed to have slowed.

Voices From the Classroom: What Teachers, Parents, and Students Say

At Liberty High School in New York City, I immediately felt a different mood. In the cafeteria during lunch, students weren’t staring at screens. They were laughing, chatting, and even playing card games. To me, it’s a small but telling sign that the cellphone ban may be doing its job.

Teachers: One teacher told me that lessons now “move smoothly,” with fewer students glancing at their phones or whispering while trying to scroll. Several educators reported that managing class feels less like a struggle and more like teaching. This echoes findings from research reporting more positive classroom environments and improved student engagement.
Parents: I encountered mixed feelings. Almost unanimously, they praised the improved focus. One mother explained that she supports the ban overall but asked the school to offer a reliable way for kids to contact their families if necessary. The concern is common: with phones locked away all day, communication becomes tricky.
Students: Some students expressed relief at not feeling tied to their phones all day and said they enjoyed being able to talk in person again. Others resented the loss of easy access to social media or messaging during free periods. Still, one student admitted: “I didn’t expect to enjoy lunch this much—we actually talk now instead of sitting alone.” That shift, small as it seems, felt powerful to me during my visit.

Research Beyond New York: My Take on Global Evidence

Looking beyond New York, there’s mounting evidence from around the world that school cellphone bans can have real academic and behavioral benefits. For example:

In the Netherlands, a government‑commissioned study of 317 high schools found that after a nationwide ban on mobile phones, 75% of secondary schools reported improved student concentration, about 59% noted a better social climate, and roughly one‑third observed improved academic performance [1].
A large‑scale analysis in England, spanning 91 schools between 2001 and 2013, concluded that banning mobile phones had a measurable effect. Test scores rose by about 6.4% of a standard deviation, making students roughly 2 percentage points more likely to pass final exams. It brought strong gains among low‑achieving and disadvantaged students [2].
More recently in late 2025, a working paper studying a major Florida school district reported that two years after a full‑day cellphone ban, student test scores improved significantly, especially in middle and high schools, and unexcused absences dropped notably [3].

During my own NYC high school visits to schools, I witnessed results that echoed this data—classrooms felt calmer, students seemed more engaged, and distractions appeared reduced. Global studies and personal observations suggest that the benefits of banning phones often go beyond theory and can translate to improvements.

Challenges I Noticed in Implementation

Implementing New York’s cellphone ban in schools isn’t without hurdles. Discipline can be tricky—students risk suspensions, which may disproportionately affect disadvantaged students.

Equity is another concern. Some students rely on phones to stay in touch with family after school, making strict bans complicated. Enforcement also takes effort. Schools need space to store devices and staff to monitor compliance. I could see why some principals were nervous. It’s one thing to implement the ban, and another to manage it fairly every day.

What This Means: From My Perspective

Early signs from the New York City school cellphone ban are encouraging. Classrooms seem calmer, and students appear more engaged with lessons.

There’s long-term potential too. Reducing screen distractions could improve mental health and help students focus academically. But there are risks. Uneven enforcement might frustrate students or create inequities between schools.

Recommendations: If I Were Making the Call

For New York’s cellphone ban in schools to succeed, it needs mental‑health support and safe ways for students to contact their families. This is also a challenge to the new leadership of the Bayonne Board of Education.

Schools should monitor outcomes like test scores, attendance, and discipline to see how the policy is working in practice. Encouraging activities that replace phone use—clubs, arts, sports—can help students stay engaged without screens. Equity is key. All students need fair access to storage and consistent enforcement. From my perspective, “I’d treat this as a gradual culture change, not just a rule to enforce overnight.”

My Takeaway on New York’s Cellphone Ban in Schools

It’s important to recognize the limitations—New York’s cellphone ban in schools isn’t a magic bullet. No single policy can solve all classroom challenges. As Jersey schools also ban technology in the classroom, positive outcomes are expected to follow.

At the same time, the early results are encouraging: classrooms feel calmer, students appear more engaged, and teachers report fewer disruptions. Visiting schools in NYC, I saw students actually interacting during lunch instead of staring at screens, which was a small but meaningful change.

FAQs: What to Know About New York’s School Cellphone Ban

Curious about how New York’s cellphone ban in schools works and what it means for students, teachers, and parents? This FAQ answers the key questions and highlights important details about the new policy.

What Exactly Does the Ban Prohibit?

The law bans the use of personal smartphones and all internet‑enabled devices (phones, tablets, smartwatches, etc.) on school grounds during the entire school day—from the morning bell to dismissal.

When Does New York City’s School Cellphone Ban Take Effect?

The policy applies statewide starting the 2025–26 school year. School districts had until August 1, 2025, to finalize their “bell-to-bell” cellphone policies.

Does the Ban Apply Even During Lunch, Study Hall, or Passing Periods?

Yes. The restriction covers all instructional and non-instructional times: class, lunch, study hall, hallways, and passing periods.

How Will Schools Handle Storage of Phones During the Day?

Each school can choose its own storage method—lockers, lockboxes, or specialized pouches. Governor Hochul allocated $13.5 million to help schools buy storage equipment if needed.

Will Parents Still Be Able to Contact Their Children During School Hours?

Yes. Schools are required to provide a way for parents or guardians to reach their child during the school day when necessary.

Are There Concerns or Downsides to New York’s Cellphone Ban in Schools?

Some concerns include the impact on students who rely on phones for after‑school communication. Schools face logistical burdens like storage, supervision, and fair enforcement. There is also a risk of unequal discipline if rules are applied inconsistently.

Is This Ban Permanent or Will the Law Be Reviewed?

The law requires schools to adopt compliant policies and to publish an annual report, including data on enforcement and any disciplinary actions, including demographic breakdowns. This transparency may influence future reviews.

References:

Kohnstamm Instituut, 2025. Monitoringsonderzoek Landelijke Afspraak Mobiele Telefoons En Andere Devices, open.overheid.nl/documenten/54c01e11-5a20-4779-9243-f4ed5fda1c9f/file.
Louis-Philippe Beland, and Richard Murphy. “Ill Communication: Technology, Distraction & Student Performance.” Centre for Economic Performance, cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/dp1350.pdf.
David N. Figlio, and Umut Özek. “THE IMPACT OF CELLPHONE BANS IN SCHOOLS ON STUDENT OUTCOMES: EVIDENCE FROM FLORIDA.” NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES, Oct. 2025.

Starbucks to Pay $35M to NYC Workers Over Labor Law Violations

Moses Lookman

December 15, 2025

I’ve been following the headlines closely, and I found the announcement that Starbucks will pay $35M to NYC workers significant. This isn’t just another corporate settlement. City officials are calling it the largest worker-protection settlement in New York City’s history.

This is much more than a dollar figure. It speaks to labor rights, corporate responsibility, and the daily realities of hourly workers. I want to reflect on what this settlement could mean for both employees and employers. In the sections ahead, I’ll break down the investigation, the settlement, how workers are reacting, and what these changes could signal for the future.

What Did the Investigation Find and How Did We Get Here?

It all began with worker complaints. According to the city’s Department of Consumer and Worker Protection (DCWP), as early as 2022, hundreds of hourly employees at more than 300 Starbucks locations across New York City began raising concerns. They said schedules were unpredictable, hours were cut arbitrarily, and extra shifts were often blocked.

The investigation found that, over three years, from July 2021 to July 2024, Starbucks racked up over 500,000 violations of New York City’s Fair Workweek Law. The law is meant to protect fast-food and retail workers from chaotic schedules and unfair cuts to their shifts. Investigators say Starbucks repeatedly violated those basic protections.

Worker Experiences & the Human Impact

Workers reportedly were kept in “involuntary part-time” status, even when they wanted more hours. They were denied shift pickups, had hours cut with little notice, and often lacked guaranteed weekly hours. For workers trying to pay rent, manage childcare, or maintain other jobs, this was devastating.

I spoke with Maria, a barista in Manhattan, who told me, “Some weeks I’d be scheduled for 30 hours, and the next week barely 10. I never knew if I could pay my rent or even get to my second job.”

Jamal, who’s worked at a Brooklyn Starbucks for four years, shared, “I kept asking for more hours. They’d always say no, and then hire new people instead. It felt like my commitment didn’t matter at all.”

To many workers, this meant unstable income, unpredictability, and a sense of being undervalued. As complaints piled up, pressure mounted, eventually forcing city regulators and Starbucks executives to confront the depth of the issue.

The Settlement: “Starbucks to Pay $35M to NYC Workers”—What That Means

When the settlement was announced on December 1, 2025, the headline was clear: Starbucks to pay $35M to NYC workers.

Here are the key numbers and terms of the agreement:

The deal covers over 15,000 hourly workers employed at Starbucks locations in New York City between July 2021 and July 2024.
Eligible workers will receive $50 for each week worked during that period.
In addition to payouts to workers, Starbucks will pay about $3.4 million in civil penalties and administrative costs.
The total settlement sums to roughly $38.9 million, with about $35.5 million going to workers.
Workers laid off during store closures will be given the chance for reinstatement at other locations.

To put it in perspective, an employee who worked consistently through those three years could receive several thousand dollars, depending on their eligible weeks.

As part of the settlement, Starbucks has also agreed to comply with the city’s scheduling law going forward. This means future schedules for Starbucks workers in NYC should be more stable and predictable.

Carlos, a part-time shift supervisor, told me, “This settlement shows that our voices do count. It’s validation for all the stress, missed hours, and financial instability we’ve faced.”

Why This Settlement Matters

This resolution feels like more than just a check in the mail. Here’s why I think Starbucks paying $35M to NYC workers is a landmark moment.

It Validates Worker Complaints

Too often, hourly workers in retail or food service are told that unpredictable scheduling or last-minute shift cuts are part of the business. This settlement pushes back. It recognizes that unstable scheduling isn’t just an inconvenience—it’s a real problem with real consequences.

Lena, a barista affected by the scheduling cuts, said, “Even $50 a week for the hours I worked over the years makes a difference. It won’t fix everything, but it’s a start—finally feeling like someone is listening.”

It Sets a Precedent for Corporate Accountability

When a multinational corporation like Starbucks faces sanctions for labor-law violations and ends up paying millions, it sends a signal. Other companies with similar schedules or staffing practices are likely to take notice. Violating worker-protection laws may no longer be treated as “just a cost of doing business.”

It May Encourage Organizing & Unionization

This settlement coincides with a broader wave of labor activism at Starbucks locations nationwide. The pressure workers put on the company seems to be paying off. Now that city law can be enforced, other workers may feel empowered to speak up or unionize, knowing their concerns can have an impact.

It Gives Real Relief to Many Workers—While Highlighting Systemic Issues

Yes, $50 per week worked isn’t earth-shattering, but for workers juggling multiple jobs or irregular hours, it can make a real difference. It may help cover overdue rent, pay bills, or offer a small cushion in a tough month.

Carlos added, “This payout doesn’t just put money in my pocket—it sends a message that companies can’t treat us like expendable labor.” “I’ve worked in several restaurants in Hoboken, but Starbucks was by far the most hectic,” said Lina.

At the same time, the need for a settlement of this size highlights how precarious hourly work remains. Erratic scheduling wasn’t isolated—it was systemic.

Reactions From Workers, Union Supporters, & Others

Since the announcement, reactions have been mixed, but many workers and labor supporters have hailed the settlement as a win.

Keisha, a barista in Queens, said, “I’ve been at Starbucks for six years, and I’ve never seen anything like this. It feels good to know the city is holding them accountable. We aren’t just numbers on a schedule anymore.”

Some expressed frustration at the perceived scale of the payout:

“Finally, some accountability. But $35M seems light for years of violations.” — Reddit user

Others questioned whether the payout would truly change things:

“Settlement doesn’t mean victory … they’re paying enough money to make the problem go away.” — Reddit user

Union supporters and some politicians emphasized that while the settlement is important, it doesn’t end the fight over wages, staffing, and working conditions.

“These are not demands of greed — these are demands of decency.” — Reddit user

For many, the payout feels like a small but meaningful step—a reminder that worker complaints must be taken seriously.

What This Means for Other Employers and the Service Sector

In my view, this settlement could influence how other large employers—especially those with hourly, shift-based workforces—handle scheduling and labor compliance.

Here’s what I see happening:

Stricter internal compliance systems: Employers may invest in better scheduling software and oversight.
Greater worker awareness and empowerment: Employees may feel more confident reporting unfair practices.
Potential for more regulatory scrutiny: Other cities might adopt similar enforcement measures.
Shifts in public and consumer perception: Customers may consider labor practices when choosing where to shop.

For the broader service sector, where unstable schedules have long been the norm, this case could mark the start of a shift toward accountability.

What I’ll Be Watching Next

Even though the settlement has been announced, I’m paying close attention to what happens now. The agreement is only as good as its implementation.

Here’s what I’ll be watching:

Whether Starbucks actually improves scheduling practices: It’s one thing to agree on paper, another to deliver reliable shifts.
Whether other cities follow NYC’s lead: If enforcement works, other municipalities may investigate similar issues.
Whether workers continue to organize and demand broader reforms: Scheduling is just one concern; wages, staffing, and benefits remain critical.
How large retailers respond: Will they proactively change policies, or resist, hoping settlements remain cheaper than real reform?

I believe this story doesn’t end with a check. It ends with whether corporations, regulators, and workers learn—and improve—from it.

Conclusion

When I think about the headline “Starbucks to pay $35M to NYC workers”, I don’t just see dollars. I see validation. I see a message: in one of the world’s biggest cities, even hourly workers deserve dignity, fairness, and predictable schedules.

I see a precedent—that laws meant to protect workers can be enforced, even against corporate giants. I see a potential shift for an entire industry that long treated erratic scheduling as a cost of doing business. And I see hope—hope that workers will be heard, that mistakes will be corrected, and that justice can come in the form of overdue paychecks and real change.

James Solomon Wins Jersey City Mayor’s Runoff Over Jim McGreevey

Moses Lookman

December 12, 2025

James Solomon has been elected mayor of Jersey City after defeating former New Jersey Gov. Jim McGreevey in a runoff election held Tuesday. With 93% of votes counted, Solomon led with 68% compared to McGreevey’s 32%, according to election results. The Associated Press projected the outcome less than an hour after polls closed. About 33,000 voters participated.

Key Takeaways

James Solomon won the Jersey City mayoral runoff with 68% of the vote, while Jim McGreevey received 32%.
The runoff followed a Nov. 4 election in which seven candidates competed, and none reached 50%.
Housing affordability, rent control, taxes, development, and public safety dominated the campaign.

How the Election Reached a Runoff and Why the Race Drew Attention

The runoff election followed the Nov. 4 general election, when seven candidates ran for mayor, and none received more than 50% of the vote. In that first round, Solomon finished first with 29% of the vote, while McGreevey placed second with 25%. Both candidates are Democrats, although party affiliation did not appear on the ballot.

The contest was viewed as a choice between Jersey City’s Democratic establishment and its progressive base. McGreevey entered the race with backing from Hudson County political leaders, though that support largely faded after his second-place finish. Solomon gained endorsements from three candidates eliminated in the first round, as well as support from U.S. Sen. Andy Kim and Newark Mayor Ras Baraka.

Solomon described the outcome as a victory against entrenched political power and stated that the election sent a message that Jersey City residents could not be influenced by developers or special interests. He pledged to lead as a mayor focused on residents rather than political insiders.

Solomon’s Political Background and Policy Priorities

Solomon is 41 years old and was first elected to the Jersey City Council in 2017, representing neighborhoods that include downtown and the waterfront. During a debate last month, he said that, as mayor, he plans to improve city schools, implement new rent controls, and oversee the development of additional affordable housing.

His platform focused heavily on cost-of-living concerns, particularly those linked to new development aimed at affluent commuters from New York City. Solomon argued that Jersey City has built a large amount of housing but has absorbed unmet demand created by New York City’s failure to build enough homes.

In addition to housing policies, Solomon has said he plans to hire 100 new police officers and supports the creation of a civilian complaint review board similar to New York City’s police oversight agency.

Solomon grew up in Millburn and earned a master’s degree from Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government. He previously worked as an aide to former Boston Mayor Thomas Menino. He moved to Jersey City in 2013 and is a married father of three.

In 2015, about a month after his wedding, Solomon was diagnosed with Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Now in full remission, he has said the experience influenced his decision to pursue public office, citing the support he received from Jersey City during that time.

Jim McGreevey’s Return to Politics and Concession

McGreevey, 68, returned to electoral politics for the first time in more than two decades during this mayoral race. A Jersey City native, he previously served as a state assemblyman, mayor of Woodbridge, and governor of New Jersey. He was elected governor in 2001 and resigned in 2004 after admitting to an extramarital affair with a man he had hired as an aide.

His resignation was also tied to controversy over his decision to appoint Golan Cipel, a former Israeli naval officer, as New Jersey’s homeland security adviser in 2002 despite Cipel lacking proper qualifications and being unable to obtain required security clearances.

After leaving office, McGreevey stepped away from electoral politics and later returned to Jersey City more than a decade ago, where he managed a prison reentry program. This election is the first time in over 20 years that his name appeared on a New Jersey ballot.

Following the runoff, McGreevey conceded defeat, congratulated Solomon, and said he does not plan to run for public office again.

Affordability, Housing, and Safety at the Center of the Campaign

Affordability emerged as the defining issue of the runoff election. On Election Day, both candidates traveled through Jersey City neighborhoods during rainy conditions to encourage residents to vote.

Solomon focused his message on limiting rent increases and holding developers accountable for building affordable housing. McGreevey emphasized requiring that 20% of new market-rate housing developments include affordable units within the same buildings.

Voter concerns centered on these issues. Jersey City resident Mike Liu said property taxes rose by approximately 20% to 30% in 2022. Another resident, Nisrit Osman, said affordability had declined to the point where multiple household incomes are often necessary to support one home.

The candidates also exchanged criticism over responsibility for rising property taxes. McGreevey said property taxes rose significantly while Solomon was in the city government. Solomon countered by blaming developers and political leaders, whom he said supported McGreevey.

Despite sharp disagreements, both candidates said the city needs safer streets and more police officers.

Transition of Leadership at City Hall

Solomon will take office in January, succeeding Mayor Steve Fulop. Fulop is stepping down after three terms following an unsuccessful run for the Democratic nomination for governor in June and plans to lead a business advocacy group.

Hoboken High School Esports Team Caps Season With Finals Appearance

Paulius Kundzelevicius

December 12, 2025

Hoboken High School closed out a memorable esports season by earning a place in the Super Smash Bros Crew Championship finals. The varsity trio of Josiah Damkins, Sean Quinn, and Ethan Sikernitsky, with coaching from Adam Anderson and support from assistant coach Sam Thomas, represented the school throughout the playoffs. The final finish stands as one of the most notable achievements since the program began.

Esports, commonly referred to as electronic sports, continues to expand across schools nationwide. Hoboken’s achievement shows how organized esports teams are now becoming a regular part of school activities. Thousands of high schools take part in official esports leagues, and hundreds of colleges run competitive programs that may include financial support for players.

Key Takeaways

Hoboken High School’s Super Smash Bros Crew Esports team finished as finalists after a full championship playoff run.
The Redwings defeated Woodbury High School and top-seeded Clayton before facing Hopatcong in the finals.
Two players met with college esports recruiters following the championship match.

Strong Playoff Performances Lead to the Championship Match

Hoboken began the postseason with a strong victory over Woodbury High School, advancing to the next round to face Clayton, the tournament’s top-seeded team. The Redwings secured a win in a challenging match, earning a spot in the championship finals.

The championship match brought a rematch with Hopatcong, a team that had previously defeated Hoboken during the regular season. In the opening game, Hoboken took control early as the team built pressure through coordinated play. The game remained close until the final moments, when Hopatcong edged ahead with a last-stock finish.

In Game 2, Hopatcong again held the advantage behind its Luigi player, who defeated all three Hoboken players while conceding only one stock. The results concluded Hoboken’s playoff run with a finalist finish.

Growth, Recognition, and New Paths Forward

Even with the finals loss, Hoboken’s postseason run showed evident progress in teamwork, planning, and in-game decision-making. The effort also opened new doors, as two players spoke with college esports representatives after the event, beginning early talks about future competitive opportunities.

Throughout the season, school administrators recognized the commitment and effort shown by the team. Athletic Director Jack Baker spoke highly of the players’ focus, steady mindset, and determination during the playoff run. Principal Robin Piccapietra also praised the students for working well together, staying disciplined, and representing Hoboken High School with pride both on and off the screen.

Hoboken High School congratulated the students and coaching staff on a successful season and pointed to the continued growth of the esports program.

Pete Alonso Opt-Out Triggers Red Sox Push as Mets’ Chances Shrink Fast

Paulius Kundzelevicius

December 11, 2025

The New York Mets were the best team in Major League Baseball two months into the season before their performance declined sharply, ending the year in disappointment. As the season progressed, uncertainty surrounded whether first baseman Pete Alonso would return once the season ended.

Key Takeaways

Pete Alonso opted out of the final year and $24 million of his two-year, $54 million contract signed in February.
MLB insider Jon Morosi said there is a better than 50/50 chance Alonso is not a Met on Opening Day.
The Boston Red Sox have been identified as the top outside threat, with the Pittsburgh Pirates also involved in monitoring the market.

Alonso’s Public Comments During the Season

During the season, Alonso said his focus remained on completing the year rather than free agency.

“But again, we’ll see what happens. I love it, it’s great, but you can’t really predict anything,” Alonso said. “And for me… I am focused on trying to put this thing across the finish line. I haven’t really thought about the free agent thing until we’re talking about it right now. It would be great to stay. But, again, whatever happens, happens. I can’t get a crystal ball. I wish I could, but we’ll see.”

Opt-Out Decision Confirmed After Elimination

After the Mets’ season ended, Pete Alonso made his intentions known almost immediately. As MLB.com’s Mark Feinsand described it, moments after the team’s abrupt finish on Sunday afternoon, Alonso had barely removed his uniform when he stated that he planned to test the free-agent market for a second straight winter. He chose to opt out of the final year and $24 million remaining on the two-year, $54 million contract he signed in February.

During the winter meetings, MLB insider Jon Morosi offered his blunt assessment, saying there was “a better than 50/50 chance Pete Alonso is NOT a New York Met on Opening Day.”

Roster Changes and Market Indicators

Following the season, the Mets traded Brandon Nimmo, an important part of the team’s core. Jeff McNeil has been identified as a likely next move. Reports also suggested the vibes in the clubhouse had been “slightly off,” potentially contributing to the Mets’ roster reset.

During this period, projected betting expectations connected to major sportsbooks such as DraftKings, FanDuel, and BetMGM indicated that the Mets were no longer viewed as an obvious favorite to retain Alonso. Projections placed New York in a +250 to +350 range, with the Boston Red Sox closely positioned behind them.

Red Sox Labeled the Primary Threat

MLB insider Jon Heyman identified Boston as the leading challenger to New York during a Bleacher Report livestream. “The Mets are the #1 suitor. It’s going to take some time, but the top threat besides the Mets is the Red Sox,” Heyman said.

Alonso is reaching free agency again after another strong season for the Mets, and is seeking long-term financial security rather than another short-term deal.

Reports state that Alonso told friends Boston ranks “high on his list” of preferred destinations.

Kyle Schwarber has also been mentioned as a factor in the market. Schwarber is another top slugger, but Alonso is younger and can still play defense to some extent, while Schwarber has been a full-time designated hitter for some time. The Red Sox have been linked to both players.

Boston also has needs in starting pitching and the bullpen while continuing to prioritize adding power to its lineup.

Pirates Remain Involved on the Edges

Bob Nightengale reported that the Pittsburgh Pirates are “hanging around in the market for Alonso.”

The Pirates have stated they plan an active offseason. Financially, their ticket and concession revenues from 2022 through 2024 roughly equaled player payroll. Fans have urged owner Bob Nutting to build around rising ace Paul Skenes.

Brian Cashman Addresses Payroll, Bellinger Talks, Injuries at Winter Meetings

Paulius Kundzelevicius

December 11, 2025

Brian Cashman arrived Sunday, December 7, 2025, at the MLB Winter Meetings at the Signia by Hilton Orlando Bonnet Creek, facing familiar questions about payroll, roster construction, and expectations. Despite public comments from owner Hal Steinbrenner that it would be “ideal” to reduce payroll, Cashman said no hard spending limit has been set.

“The last time I spoke with you guys, I told you that Hal hadn’t given me a drop-dead number and that’s still the case,” Cashman said. “Hal’s exact words to me continue to be, ‘Take everything that’s out there to me,’ which I will continue to do.”

Key Takeaways

Brian Cashman said Hal Steinbrenner has not set a fixed payroll cap and continues to ask that all potential moves be presented to ownership.
The Yankees are seeking better lineup balance, bullpen depth, and pitching support while relying on a 94-win roster that led MLB in runs and home runs.
Cashman directly refuted Sonny Gray’s criticism of the Yankees, recounting detailed conversations and events from Gray’s time in New York.

Payroll Context, Team Confidence, and Market Expectations

The Yankees finished last season with a payroll of approximately $319 million and are projected to be around $283 million heading into the upcoming year. Cashman said Steinbrenner has not instructed him to reduce payroll from last season’s level, and pointed out that the team increased spending at the trade deadline despite already exceeding the highest luxury tax threshold. The top competitive balance tax threshold for the coming season is $304 million.

Cashman reiterated his confidence in the roster after a 94-win season that ended with an American League Division Series loss to the Toronto Blue Jays. New York led Major League Baseball in both runs scored, with 849, and home runs, with 274.

“First and foremost, let’s start with the premise that we have really good players on this roster,” Cashman said. “We are covered in most all areas that you need to be covered.”

That internal confidence aligns with how the team is being priced publicly. Across major sportsbooks, including DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM, and Caesars, the Yankees are listed near the top of the 2026 World Series futures. Most markets place New York between +700 and +750 to win the championship, second only to the Los Angeles Dodgers, with some books offering prices as long as +850.

Bellinger Talks and a Left-Handed Lineup Issue

Cashman confirmed continued discussions with Scott Boras, the agent for Cody Bellinger, and said a reunion remains possible. He last spoke with Boras on Saturday and described Bellinger as a fit based on versatility and production.

“Cody Bellinger would be a great fit for us,” Cashman said. “I think he’d be a great fit for anybody.”

Lineup balance is a central concern. Austin Wells, Ben Rice, Jazz Chisholm Jr., Ryan McMahon, and Trent Grisham all bat left-handed. Switch-hitter Jasson Domínguez owns a .136 career average and a .530 OPS against left-handed pitching.

“I acknowledge that we are left-handed dominant throughout our lineup,” Cashman said. “So to get more choices for our manager would be a great thing for us to do.”

If Bellinger does not return, the Yankees could fill left field internally. Domínguez is the current favorite, while Spencer Jones is expected to compete during spring training.

“We’re very high on Domínguez and what he brings to the table,” Cashman said. “I think there’s a lot more to come.”

Pitching Injuries, Bullpen Losses, and Their Impact

The Yankees expect to begin the season with a short-handed pitching staff. Carlos Rodón, who underwent left elbow surgery in October, is projected to return in April or May. Gerrit Cole, who had Tommy John surgery on his right elbow in March, is tracking toward a return in late May or June.

The bullpen also requires attention after the departures of Devin Williams and Luke Weaver. Cashman said he never made Williams an offer before the reliever signed a three-year, $51 million deal with the Mets.

Those injury timelines and bullpen losses correspond with a modest drift in Yankees futures odds from shorter prices earlier in the year to their current +700 to +850 range, even as they remain near the top of the market.

Trade Flexibility and Cashman’s Response to Sonny Gray

Cashman said the Yankees are open to “challenge trades,” describing them as exchanges of established talent for established talent. He referenced the 2012 deal in which the Yankees acquired Michael Pineda for Jesus Montero as an example, while acknowledging that such trades are difficult due to his belief in the current roster.

“Our division is the toughest division in baseball,” Cashman said. “It typically is — the beast of the East. We know our work is cut out for us. But the job is to try to add to it.”

Cashman also addressed comments made by Sonny Gray after the pitcher’s recent trade from St. Louis to Boston. At his introductory Red Sox press conference, Gray said it “feels good” to be somewhere “where… it’s easy to hate the Yankees,” and added that he did not feel allowed “to go out there and be Sonny” during his time in New York.

Cashman said those feelings were never communicated until after the 2018 trade deadline had passed.

“That’s when he told me he never wanted to be here. He hates New York, this is the worst place, he sits in his hotel room — he told me all this stuff,” Cashman said.

According to Cashman, Gray had previously expressed enthusiasm about joining the Yankees, including through messages relayed by his college roommate at Vanderbilt, who later worked as the Yankees’ minor league video coordinator. Cashman said Gray later admitted that enthusiasm was staged at the advice of his agent, Bo McKinnis, to protect his free agency.

After the 2018 season, the Yankees traded Gray to Cincinnati for minor league infielder Shed Long Jr. and a competitive balance draft pick. Gray went 15–16 with a 4.51 ERA in 41 games, including 34 starts, during his Yankees tenure.

The Red Sox are scheduled to visit Yankee Stadium from June 5–7 and August 28–30 in 2026, renewing the rivalry.

Tom Brady Super Bowl Wins: The Record That Changed NFL History

Paulius Kundzelevicius

December 10, 2025

Tom Brady’s career didn’t unfold the way a scouting report would’ve predicted. He went from a quiet high school prospect to Michigan backup, from a sixth-round draft pick to the quarterback Bill Belichick turned to out of necessity, and eventually to the player who managed to stretch a career across two decades and two franchises.

Along the way were the seasons that defined him — early Super Bowls, record-setting years, setbacks, the move to Tampa, and the transition into media and business once the playing part ended. His seven Super Bowl wins are unmatched, but the rest of his career shows how he managed to stick around at the top for as long as he did.

Key Takeaways

Tom Brady won a record seven Super Bowl championships, played in 10 Super Bowls, and holds most major NFL passing and playoff records.
After retiring as a player in February 2023, Brady began a 10-year, $375 million role as FOX Sports’ lead NFL analyst in fall 2024 and will call Super Bowl LIX.
Beyond football, Brady is a sports investor, business founder, documentary producer, and philanthropist with a net worth estimated at $300 million as of February 2025.

Early Life and Athletic Background

Thomas Edward Patrick Brady Jr. was born on August 3, 1977, in San Mateo, California. He attended Junipero Serra High School in San Mateo, where he was a two-sport standout and also played basketball. He began playing varsity football as a junior and led his team to the state playoffs. Brady earned All-State and All-Far-West honors and was named his team’s player of the year twice.

In 1995, Brady and his father mailed highlight tapes to colleges across the country. He received interest from California, UCLA, Illinois, and Michigan. That same year, Brady was drafted by the Montreal Expos as a catcher in the 18th round of the 1995 Major League Baseball Draft. He chose to attend the University of Michigan on a full athletic scholarship instead of pursuing professional baseball.

College Career at the University of Michigan

Brady redshirted during his first year at Michigan and did not play. His first collegiate pass during the 1996–97 season against UCLA was intercepted and returned for a touchdown. He spent most of the following two seasons as a reserve quarterback before earning the starting role. As a two-year starter, Brady finished with a 20–5 record, including wins in the 1999 Citrus Bowl and the 2000 Orange Bowl. From 1998 to 1999, Michigan won 15 of 16 games. Brady was named the team MVP and an All-Big Ten Conference second-team selection in 1999. He also served as Brian Griese’s backup during Michigan’s 1997 national championship season and helped lead the team to a Big Ten title in 1998.

NFL Draft and Early Years With the New England Patriots

At the NFL Draft Combine, Brady recorded a slow 40-yard dash and an unimpressive vertical jump, and scouts questioned his arm strength. He was selected 199th overall in the sixth round of the 2000 NFL Draft by the New England Patriots. During his rookie season, Brady appeared in one game as a backup.

In the second game of the 2001 season against the New York Jets, starting quarterback Drew Bledsoe suffered an injury that sidelined him for the remainder of the season. Brady became the starter and led the Patriots to an 11–5 record and an AFC East Division Championship. In the playoffs, New England defeated the Oakland Raiders after a late-game ruling overturned what initially appeared to be a Brady fumble. The Patriots went on to defeat the St. Louis Rams in Super Bowl XXXVI, where Brady earned his first Super Bowl MVP award.

Super Bowls, Awards, and Setbacks

Brady led New England to additional Super Bowl victories in Super Bowls XXXVIII and XXXIX, earning a second Super Bowl MVP in XXXVIII. In 2007, with Randy Moss joining the team, Brady threw a then-record 50 touchdown passes, won the Associated Press Most Valuable Player award, and helped the Patriots finish the regular season undefeated before losing to the New York Giants in Super Bowl XLII.

During the first game of the 2008 season, Brady suffered a knee injury that required surgery and caused him to miss the entire season. He returned to play and signed a new contract in 2010. In the 2011 season, he led the Patriots to Super Bowl XLVI, where they lost to the Giants 21–17. Before the game, Brady’s then-wife Gisele Bündchen asked friends and family to pray for him and to “envision him happy and fulfilled, experiencing with his team a victory.”

In December 2012, after a loss to the San Francisco 49ers in which New England erased a 28-point deficit but lost 41–34, Brady said on WEEI-AM, “I’m really proud of the fact our guys never blinked an eye down 28 points against probably the best defense in the league.”

Deflategate and Super Bowl LI

After the 2014 season, the NFL investigated footballs used by the Patriots in the AFC Championship Game against the Indianapolis Colts and found that several were underinflated, with one measuring 2 pounds per square inch below the league minimum. The controversy became known as “Deflategate.” Brady stated, “I didn’t alter the balls in any way, [and] I would never have someone do something that was outside the rules.” Investigator Ted Wells later reported that Brady was “generally aware” of football tampering by a locker room attendant.

Brady was suspended for the first four games of the 2015 season. After multiple appeals, he accepted the suspension in July 2016. Despite missing four games, Brady led the Patriots to Super Bowl LI. Before the game, he said he wanted to win for his mother, who was dealing with an undisclosed illness. At NRG Stadium in Houston, Brady led New England back from a 25-point deficit to defeat the Atlanta Falcons 34–28 in overtime, the first overtime Super Bowl in NFL history. He threw for a Super Bowl-record 466 yards and earned his fourth Super Bowl MVP.

Later Career With New England and Tampa Bay

At age 40 in 2017, Brady threw for an NFL-high 4,577 yards and led the Patriots to a 13–3 record. Despite injuring his throwing hand before the AFC Championship Game in January 2018 and reportedly needing more than 10 stitches, he helped New England reach Super Bowl LII. Brady threw a Super Bowl-record 505 yards but lost to the Philadelphia Eagles 41–33.

In Super Bowl LIII, the Patriots defeated the Los Angeles Rams 13–3. Brady did not throw a touchdown but led two fourth-quarter scoring drives, earning his sixth Super Bowl championship.

After the 2019 season, during which the Patriots finished 8–0 before being eliminated in the first round of the playoffs, Brady announced on March 17, 2020, that he would leave New England. On March 20, 2020, he signed with the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. In his first season, he led Tampa Bay to Super Bowl LV, defeating the Kansas City Chiefs 31–9. Brady earned his seventh Super Bowl championship and fifth Super Bowl MVP and became the oldest player to appear in and win a Super Bowl MVP at 43 years and 168 days old.

Retirement, Records, and Life After Football

Brady first announced his retirement in February 2022, returned for the 2022 season, and retired permanently in February 2023 after the Buccaneers finished 8–9 and lost in the wild-card round to the Dallas Cowboys.

He retired holding records for 286 combined regular-season and playoff wins, 251 regular-season wins, 7,753 completions, 12,050 passing attempts, 649 passing touchdowns, and 89,214 passing yards. He also holds records for 35 playoff quarterback wins, 13,400 playoff passing yards, and 88 playoff passing touchdowns. In the Super Bowl, Brady holds records for passing yards (3,039), completions (277), touchdown passes (21), starts (10), and appearances by a quarterback (10).

In June 2024, Brady was inducted into the New England Patriots Hall of Fame, and his No. 12 jersey was retired. During the ceremony, Patriots owner Robert Kraft announced the team would install a 12-foot statue honoring Brady outside the Patriots Pro Shop, the first statue dedicated to a Patriots player.

Tom Brady officially began his next NFL chapter on September 8, 2024, when he made his debut as FOX Sports’ lead NFL analyst during the Dallas Cowboys vs. Cleveland Browns game. He works alongside play-by-play announcer Kevin Burkhardt, with Erin Andrews and Tom Rinaldi serving as reporters.

The broadcast team calls FOX’s top NFL game each week and will also call Super Bowl LIX from New Orleans. FOX Corporation Executive Chair and CEO Lachlan Murdoch first announced Brady’s future broadcasting role during a May 2022 company earnings call, stating Brady would join the FOX NFL booth following his retirement from professional football.

Business Ventures, Family, and Media Appearances

In 2015, Brady founded the TB12 Foundation. In 2016, he launched the TB12 health and fitness brand and later published The TB12 Method in 2017. As of February 2025, Celebrity Net Worth estimates his net worth at approximately $300 million. He earns $37.5 million per season as a FOX Sports analyst, totaling $375 million through 2034. Brady holds minority ownership stakes in the Las Vegas Raiders, the Las Vegas Aces, and English soccer club Birmingham City, including a reported 5 percent limited partnership in the Raiders.

Brady was married to supermodel Gisele Bündchen from 2009 until their divorce in 2022. He has three children: Jack, Benjamin, and Vivian. After the divorce, Bündchen stated in a March 2023 interview with Vanity Fair, “Sometimes you grow together; sometimes you grow apart.” The pair shares joint custody of their children. Brady has also appeared in television shows, films, documentaries, and, in May 2024, was featured in The Roast of Tom Brady on Netflix.

The City Rolls Out Hoboken Christmas Highlights for This Year’s Holiday Events

Moses Lookman

December 9, 2025

City Announces Hoboken Christmas Schedule for Holiday 2025

Hoboken is preparing for a full month of winter events, community programs, and small-business activities set to begin on December 11. The City, the Hoboken Business Alliance (HBA), and several local partners have worked together to build a schedule that includes longtime traditions, markets, workshops, charity drives, and transportation options to help people move easily around town during the busy season.

Key Takeaways

Hoboken’s annual Christmas Tree Lighting will take place on December 11, 2025, from 5 PM to 6:30 PM at the 11th Street island, featuring youth performances, Santa’s visit, Elvis the Elf, and free treats from local businesses.
Holiday Night Out returns on December 13 with Washington Street discounts, live music, kids’ activities, and four free adult workshops, followed by citywide markets, performances, and community programs throughout December.
The City is providing travel and parking support—including free Holiday Hop shuttle service through December 21, free 30-minute Washington Street parking, and up to four hours of free weekend garage parking for shoppers with a $25 receipt.

Tree Lighting Marks the Start of the Season on December 11

The City’s annual Christmas Tree Lighting will take place on Thursday, December 11, 2025, from 5 PM to 6:30 PM at the 11th Street island at 11th and Washington Streets. This event includes several seasonal features, offered in partnership with Hoboken businesses and community groups.

The evening program will offer:

Performances by Hoboken youth
Santa Claus appears at the celebration
Complimentary cinnamon rolls from The Hive
Free hot cocoa served by Mojo Coffee
Holiday hosting by Elvis the Elf

To help seniors attend, the senior Hop shuttle will pick up passengers starting at 3:30 PM from the Multi-Service Center (124 Grand Street).

The shuttle route will stop at:

Monroe Gardens
Columbian Towers
Adams Gardens
Fox Hill Gardens
Hoboken Housing Authority
Columbian Arms

A return shuttle service will be available at 12th and Washington Streets once the event concludes.

Holiday Night Out and Free Workshops on December 13

Two days later, Washington Street becomes the center of the Holiday Night Out event on Saturday, December 13, running from 3 PM to 7 PM. The HBA is coordinating this one-evening program to support local shops and restaurants while offering festive activities for all ages.

During Holiday Night Out, visitors can expect:

Seasonal dining specials
Hot chocolate and children’s activities
Live music and face painting
Limited-time business discounts
One-night-only shopping promotions

A set of free workshop sessions will be held throughout the afternoon and evening. The workshops appear in reordered format:

Candlelight Yoga to De-Stress, Surya Yoga, 618 Washington St. — 5 PM–6 PM
Holiday Salsa Class, Garden Street Dance, 1018 Washington St. — 5 PM–6:30 PM
Santa Hat Decorating, The Hoboken Collective, 323 Washington St. — 5 PM–6:30 PM
Cookie Decorating with Atelier Sucre, Symposia Books, 510 Washington St. — 5:30 PM–7 PM

Upcoming registration links will be posted by the HBA. More information can be found at visithoboken.com or on Instagram (@visithoboken).

Markets, Theater, and Citywide Seasonal Features

December includes several returning traditions and special programs.

Holiday Artisan Market

The Main Street Pops Holiday Artisan Market at 770 Jackson Plaza will be open on December 7, 14, and 21 from 11 AM to 4 PM.

The market features over 75 vendors, offering:

Home décor
Handmade jewelry
Clothing and accessories
Pet items
Art and photography
Other artisan gift goods

Festive elements vary by day and may include community performances, bounce houses, holiday music, and an inflatable village. On December 7, a seasonal pop-up called the Sleigh Bell Lounge will be available at the Brass Rail.

A Christmas Carol: A Radio Play

From December 11 to December 21, Mile Square Theatre will present A Christmas Carol: A Radio Play at 1400 Clinton Street. This production retells the Charles Dickens story in the style of a 1940s radio broadcast, written by Joe Landry, and performed by a small cast who take on numerous roles with vintage-style holiday elements.

Toy Drive Helps Local Families Through December 12

The Hoboken Police Department is collecting donations for the fifth annual Sgt. Peter Zanin “Peachy” Toy Drive. Residents may bring new, unwrapped toys, books, games, sports equipment, and other gifts to Hoboken Police Headquarters (106 Hudson Street) through December 12.

Items collected will be shared with children and teens at the Hoboken Housing Authority and will be part of the giveaways during FamilyHood’s Winter Wonderland, scheduled for December 13 from 4 PM to 7 PM.

Menorah Lighting and Gelt Drop Scheduled for December 14

The City of Hoboken and Chabad of Hoboken & Jersey City will host the annual Menorah Lighting at Hoboken City Hall, 94 Washington Street, on Sunday, December 14, at 5 PM. The event will include a gelt drop, supported by the Hoboken Fire Department. Additional details will be shared as the date approaches.

Holiday Hop and Parking Options Support Local Shopping

To make it easier to take part in holiday events and shop locally, the City is offering both transportation services and reduced parking costs.

Holiday Hop Shuttle

The free Holiday Hop shuttle is available on weekends from 11 AM to 6 PM through December 21, except for a 2 PM–3 PM break. The route matches the weekday Senior Hop, connecting Washington Street with areas near the Monroe Center. A full loop takes about 45 minutes.

Shuttle tracking is available through the Passio GO app by selecting “senior hop.” Riders may signal the shuttle at any intersection; buses stop after crossing the intersection.

Parking Discounts

The City is offering:

Up to four hours of free parking on weekends through January 2, 2026, in
- Garage B (28 Second St.)
- Garage D (215 Hudson St.)
- Midtown Garage (371 Fourth St.)
  when presenting a same-day receipt of at least $25 from a local business or restaurant
Parking reservations through the ParkMobile app for Garage B, Garage D, and the Midtown Garage
- Monday–Thursday: 6 PM–2 AM
- Friday 6 PM through Sunday midnight
Free 30-minute parking along Washington Street
- Weekdays: 3 PM–9 PM
- Weekends: 9 AM–9 PM, through December 31
  The discount applies automatically when a ParkMobile session is started in a Washington Street zone.

City Moves to Protect Bayonne Parks with Updated Enforcement Measures

Moses Lookman

December 9, 2025

Bayonne officials are moving ahead with an ordinance designed to protect municipal parks from misuse, including attempts to turn them into homeless encampments. The proposal introduces insurance requirements for organized events, limits activities that resemble camping, and creates uniform park hours to support safety and upkeep.

Key Takeaways

Bayonne’s proposed ordinance (Agenda No. O-11) would require groups using municipal parks for organized activities to carry at least $1,000,000 in liability coverage and $50,000 in property damage insurance, with public schools exempt from this requirement.
The ordinance establishes strict rules against camping, cooking devices, landscape alterations, and the accumulation of furniture or debris in parks, while setting uniform park hours from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. and limiting overnight presence without special permission.
Individuals cited for violations related to prohibited structures or sleeping may avoid penalties if they have no outstanding citations and accept Social Services within 30 hours, including housing, substance abuse treatment, outreach services, or medical admission.

Insurance Requirements and Updated Rules for Organized Activities

The ordinance proposes amendments to Chapter 13, Municipal Parks and Playgrounds, of the city’s general ordinances. Under these changes, any group or organization seeking to use a municipal park for a group activity must provide general liability insurance from an insurer licensed in New Jersey. The policy must name the City of Bayonne as an additional insured and include at least $1,000,000 per occurrence and $50,000 for property damage.

The Division of Recreation will continue to issue rules for group activities and must post these rules prominently in each park. These notices must state that violations can result in fines up to $1,250, as allowed by Chapter 1, Section 1-5 of the municipal code. Public schools under the City of Bayonne Board of Education remain exempt from the insurance requirement.

Restrictions on Camping, Cooking Devices, and Altering Park Grounds

A major focus of the ordinance is preventing residents from using city parks as living spaces. The proposal states that no person may maintain or inhabit any structure, tent, or object used for housing or camping; it also prohibits constructing or keeping any device used for cooking unless the Division of Recreation gives written permission.

Additional limits bar visitors from modifying the landscape to create shelters or from accumulating items such as household furniture, appliances, or construction debris in any park. The intent is to provide clear rules about what activities cannot occur on park property.

Park Hours and Conditions for Waiving Violations

The ordinance sets uniform hours for all municipal parks: 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Remaining in a park for the purpose of sleeping during these hours would not be allowed unless the Division of Recreation grants special permission. Exceptions may be made for people performing security services during restricted hours and for special events that have official approval.

The ordinance also creates a path for avoiding penalties. A person cited for violating the rules on camping or sleeping would not be held in violation if they meet two conditions:

They have no outstanding citation for the same section.
They accept Social Services within 30 hours of receiving the citation.

Social Services, as defined in the ordinance, may include temporary or permanent housing, residential substance abuse treatment, homeless outreach, or admission to a hospital or residential facility for medical treatment. An “outstanding citation” refers to one that is unpaid or currently under appeal.

The ordinance specifies that only conflicting portions of previous ordinances will be repealed and that the amendments will take effect upon passage and publication according to law.

1...789...171 Page 8 of 171